Working with modern pottery makers to learn pot-making and then using that information to make a hypothesis about how ancient populations might have fired clay pots is an example of
O ecofacts
O paleontology
O experimental archeology
• ethnoarcheology

The types of imperialism when matched with their characteristics would be:

Economic imperialism involves the economic domination of a weaker country or region by a more powerful one. Political imperialism involves the exertion of political control over a weaker country or region by a more powerful one.

Colonial imperialism involves the establishment of colonies in a weaker country or region by a more powerful one. Socio-cultural imperialism  involves the imposition of cultural values, norms, or practices by a more powerful country or region on a weaker one.

Find out more on imperialism at https://brainly.com/question/7590600

#SPJ1

The rest of the question is:

Match each type of imperialism with its characteristics

Tiles

colonial imperialism,

socio-cultural imperialism,

political imperialism,

economic imperialism,

paires

The imperialist nation control trade and other business.

The subordinate nation has its own government but follows the orders of the imperial nation.

The imperialist nation exercises complete political, economic, and military control over the colony.

The imperialist nation tries to change the colony’s customs, languages, and religious practices.

Answer:

the USS Hornet and the USS Yorktown.

Explanation:

hope it helps :)

Answer:

Lebensraum was a key concept in Nazi Germany's foreign policy and played a role in their aggression towards neighboring countries. While the concept did not directly impact United States history, it did contribute to the overall global tensions that led to World War II, which had significant effects on the US.

Explanation:

The ease or difficulty of building bipartisan agreement on issues depends on various factors. In general, if there is a high degree of polarization and partisanship among politicians and the public, it can be challenging to build bipartisan agreement.

This is because individuals may be more likely to prioritize their ideological and partisan affiliations over compromising and finding common ground. However, if there is a willingness among politicians to collaborate and engage in constructive dialogue, bipartisan agreement can be easier to achieve. Factors such as shared values, common goals, and mutual respect can facilitate the negotiation and compromise required to build a consensus. Ultimately, the difficulty or ease of building bipartisan agreement depends on the specific issue and context in which it is being discussed. Factors such as the level of public engagement, media coverage, and interest group involvement can also influence the likelihood of bipartisan agreement.

For more information on ideological see:

https://brainly.com/question/24353091

#SPJ1

The relationship between protests and bipartisan agreement on issues is complex and can vary depending on the situation. On one hand, protests can raise awareness about issues and put pressure on politicians to take action,

which can help build support for a cause and potentially lead to bipartisan agreement. For example, peaceful protests and civil disobedience during the civil rights movement in the 1960s helped build bipartisan support for the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. On the other hand, protests can also be divisive and polarizing, which can make it more difficult to build bipartisan agreement. If protesters are perceived as being extreme or uncompromising, politicians from opposing parties may be less likely to work together on an issue for fear of alienating their base or being seen as "weak" on a particular issue.

For more information on bipartisan see:

https://brainly.com/question/25001062

#SPJ1

Answer:

Ukraine is located in Eastern Europe

Explanation:

Between criollos, or those born in the Americas, and peninsulares, or people born in Spain, there were classes in Spanish colonial society.

The Peninsulares, Creoles, Mestizos, Mulattoes, Native American Indians, and Slaves were the first social groups in the Spanish colonies, followed by Mestizos, Mestizos, Mulattoes, and Slaves. Due to the fact that they were born on the Spanish peninsula, they were known as peninsulares. Just 2% of people were members of this strong elite. The Creoles came next.

From 1492 and 1976, Spain and its forerunner nations ruled a colonial empire known as the Spanish Empire, sometimes known as the Hispanic Monarchy or the Catholic Monarchy.

To know more about colonial society visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/29770773

#SPJ9

When the Confederates won a series of battles, more Northerners began to question the war. In response, Lincoln suspended habeas corpus and many people were put in jail without trial.

A legal principle known as habeas corpus guards against the government's arbitrary detention of people. Anybody who is detained or imprisoned has the legal right to appeal their custody in court under the provisions of the habeas corpus. In order to maintain law and order and stop the secession of Southern states even during American Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln suspended the habeas corpus proceedings in several regions of the nation. Not everyone agreed with Lincoln's decision to suspend proceedings. Opponents claimed that it violated civil freedoms and gave the government excessive authority to hold people without charge or trial.

To learn more about habeas corpus refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/24231138

#SPJ1

Answer:

As a leader in the German government, I would feel humiliated and outraged by the terms of the treaty. I would also be concerned about the impact it would have on our economy and national pride, and would likely seek ways to challenge or renegotiate the terms of the treaty.

Explanation:

A leader in the Weimar Republic likely would have felt resentment and frustration over the Treaty of Versailles provisions including the War Guilt Clause, heavy reparations, military reductions and territorial losses. However, they might also see this as a chance to promote peace and rebuild the society.

As a leader in the Weimar Republic, my initial reaction to signing the Treaty of Versailles would likely be a combination of resentment, frustration, and concern. The War Guilt Clause and the costs of reparations might be viewed as highly unjust and excessive. The $33 billion in reparations would likely be seen as a heavy financial burden. Furthermore, the reduction in the military and territorial loss could be perceived as an affront to national pride and security. However, considering the circumstances, it could also be an opportunity to promote peace and reconciliation efforts to rebuild the society.

https://brainly.com/question/35896255

#SPJ3

Answer:

According to the "Stages of Adulthood" theory by Erik Erikson, if you are 79 years old, you are in the "Late Adulthood" stage. This stage typically lasts from age 65 until the end of life.

Answer:

Certainly! The United States foreign policies before the invasion of Pearl Harbor regarding involvement in World War II can be broadly classified into three categories: 1. Isolationism: The United States adopted an isolationist foreign policy during the 1930s, which was characterized by a desire to stay out of international conflicts. This policy was driven partly by the nation's fatigue after World War I and a desire to focus on domestic issues. The isolationist approach was reflected in the Neutrality Acts of 1935, 1936, and 1937, which aimed to prevent the U.S. from being drawn into another war in Europe. 2. Lend-Lease: The Lend-Lease policy was introduced in 1941 as a way to provide military aid to the Allied powers without the United States formally entering the war. Under this policy, the U.S. provided war supplies and other

Option a is correct. The political climate in the Tropical North in the late 1900s was one in which kings created dynasties that were governed by royal families.

The political movement known as "republicanism" in the UK aims to abolish the monarchy and substitute it with a republic. The movement's backers, known as republicans, favor alternatives to monarchy, such as an elected chief of state.

Since the Middle Ages, the nations that now make up the United Kingdom have almost solely been governed by monarchies. As a result of the Parliamentarian victory in the English Civil War, a republican government was in place in England and Wales in the mid-17th century, and subsequently in Ireland and Scotland.

Charles I was put to death in 1649, and the Commonwealth of England, as it was known, endured until the monarchy was restored in 1660.

Instead of the dissolution of the British Union or the freedom of its member states, the abolition of the British monarch has received the majority of republican support in Britain. The word "republican" is frequently used in Northern Ireland to refer to Irish republicanism. Irish republicans support the establishment of a unified Ireland, an all-island state encompassing all of Ireland, while also opposing the monarchy and any form of the British state existing on the island of Ireland. In Northern Ireland, there are also unionists who favor a British republic.

Know more about political here:

https://brainly.com/question/10369837

#SPJ1

Answer:

Explanation:

The Emancipation Proclamation broadened the goals of the Civil War.The Proclaim of Emancipation expanded the Civil War aims. Although slavery was a big issue that led to the conflict, at the beginning of the war Lincoln claimed that the  war's purpose was to maintain the Union.  That is, originally, to avoid secession from the South and to preserve the Union, the North fought a civil war with the South. The abolition of slavery was not a priority

The Declaration of Independence modified the scope and purpose of the civil war. There was not only the preservation of the Union in the war, but also the emancipation of slaves. Global forces such as France and Great Britain had lost their enthusiasm for giving their support to the Confederate

British and French authorities in real never supported or recognized the Confederacy. The main reason was the slavery system, which in England and France was illegal

Answer:

The Estates-General of 1789 was a general assembly representing the French estates of the realm summoned by Louis XVI to propose solutions to France's financial problems. It ended when the Third Estate formed into a National Assembly, signaling the outbreak of the French Revolution.

Answer:

The Yamato rulers began calling themselves emperors of Japan in the 7th century AD, as a way to legitimize their rule and gain greater influence and authority. This move was partly influenced by China, which had an emperor, and the Yamato rulers wanted to be seen as equal in rank and status to their powerful neighbor. It was also a way to distinguish themselves from other regional rulers in Japan who did not claim the title of emperor. Over time, the imperial court in Japan became more established and the emperor became a symbol of unity and stability in the country.

Hope This Helps!

The governing body most likely to carry out each act.

The Veterans Educational Assistance Act (2008), No Child Left Behind Act (2001), Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (2010), Protect America Act (2007), Helping Families Save Their Homes Act (2009), Farm Security and Rural Investment Act (2002), Violent Crime Control.

Law Enforcement Act (1994), American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (2009) and Nuclear Waste Policy Act (1982) were all passed by Congress.

Enforcement and Regulation:

From the given data some of the instances fall under enforcement as such, monitor workplaces to ensure safety and health standards, evaluate possible cancer-causing substances, and ensure agricultural workers receive fair treatment.

In-case of regulation, the instances are employers must use a certain method for calculating overtime pay, record and report work-related fatalities, injuries, and illnesses, educate employees about the Fair Labor Standards Act, and post a notice explaining minimum wage laws.

Enforcement and regulation are two closely related concepts used in government oversight and control of various aspects of society. Enforcement involves ensuring that regulations are followed and violators are held accountable, while regulation involves establishing rules, standards, and guidelines that govern behavior.

The Department of Labor is responsible for promoting and improving working conditions and ensuring workers are treated fairly and compensated. It enforces federal labor laws, protects worker rights, administers benefit programs, collects and analyzes labor statistics, provides training and education,helps employers create safe and productive work environments.

HIPAA is a federal law in the United States that was enacted in 1996 to protect the privacy and security of individuals' health information and ensure their health insurance coverage. It applies to healthcare providers, health plans, and healthcare clearinghouses, as well as business associates of covered entities.

Learn more about Enforce here:

brainly.com/question/1306203

#SPJ1

Sri lanka is a little island is found southeast of India's tip .  The Palk Strait separates Sri Lanka from India, its sole neighbor.

In 1948, after almost 150 years of English rule, Sri Lanka turned into a free nation, and it was owned up to the Assembled Countries seven years after the fact. The nation is a member of both the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation and the Commonwealth.

Both nations have sought to establish a common security umbrella in the Indian Ocean due to their strategic position in South Asia. Sri Lanka and India are republics that are members of the Commonwealth of Nations.

To learn more about Sri Lanka visit :

https://brainly.com/question/3626335

#SPJ1

Frederick Douglass and Abraham Lincoln eventually became allies in the fight to end slavery in the United States, despite their initial disagreements and differences. What factors contributed to their eventual collaboration, and why was their partnership so crucial in the fight against slavery?

Initially, Douglass and Lincoln had very different views on the best way to end slavery. Douglass was an outspoken abolitionist who believed in immediate emancipation and full civil rights for African Americans. Lincoln, on the other hand, was more cautious and believed in a gradual approach to ending slavery, as he was focused on preserving the Union and avoiding a civil war.

However, as the Civil War progressed and the Union began to gain ground, Lincoln began to see the importance of abolition as a means of weakening the Confederacy and securing victory. Meanwhile, Douglass continued to use his influence as a prominent African American leader to push for emancipation and equal rights for all.

Their eventual collaboration was crucial in several ways. First, Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation was heavily influenced by Douglass's advocacy and pressure, as well as by the changing political climate of the war. Second, Douglass's support helped to rally African American troops to fight for the Union and strengthened the cause of abolition within the Union ranks. Finally, their partnership helped to lay the groundwork for the eventual passage of the 13th Amendment, which officially abolished slavery in the United States.

In the end, Douglass and Lincoln's partnership was a testament to the power of collaboration and compromise in the face of significant differences. Despite their disagreements, they were able to find common ground and work together towards a shared goal of ending slavery and securing civil rights for African Americans. Their example is a powerful reminder of the importance of building bridges and working together towards a better future.

There were three joint-stock companies: the Virginia Company, the British East India Company, and the Dutch East India Company.

Often regarded as the first truly worldwide firm, the Dutch East India Company (VOC; Verenigde Oost-indische Companies) was established in 1602. Trading firms like VOC (and its British equivalent) flourished between the 17th and 18th centuries.

Both of them were founded with the intent of controlling trade in a certain region of the world; the British want control of the Mediterranean Sea, while the Dutch desired control of the spice trade in the area surrounding the Indian Ocean.

To know more about Dutch East India Company visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/992796

#SPJ9

Muslims held the belief that Hindus were favored by the British Raj. Gandhi's proposal for a unified premiership was rejected by leaders like Nehru. Option a and d is correct .

After the Great War, also known as the First World War, Indian Muslims turned against the British because the British were fighting the Central Powers and the Ottoman Empire, which is now Turkey, was not active at first. Muslims from South Asia had already begun to fight for Great Britain, and the Ottoman Empire joined the war alongside the Central Powers. Indian Muslims were fighting their brothers and were also worried about what would happen to Islamic centers all over the world if the Caliphate—an Islamic state led by the Caliph—were to take power.

To learn more about Gandhi visit :

https://brainly.com/question/28695626

#SPJ1

Answer:

In the case of Roe v. Wade, the group of Supreme Court justices believed that a woman's right to privacy extended to her decision to have an abortion, and that the state could not unduly restrict that right. They argued that the government had no compelling interest in regulating a woman's reproductive choices in the first trimester of pregnancy.

Explanation:

America was profoundly impacted by the Vietnam War. Domestically, the unpopularity of the war caused the military conscription to be abolished in 1973, and the United States has not since enlisted soldiers from the general populace. The conflict also significantly reduced Americans' faith in political authorities.

Public opinion started to shift against U.S. engagement as reports from the field became more widely available to civilians, while many Americans continued to favor it. Some believed their government had deceived them by not telling the truth about the conflict. As a result, there was more public pressure to halt the conflict.

American soldiers—both volunteers and draftees—became more physically and psychologically ill as the conflict dragged on. This included drug usage, PTSD, mutinies, and assaults by soldiers on officers and noncommissioned officers.

To know more about Vietnam War, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/3376434

#SPJ1

Answer:

Explanation:

The Federalist views on the Constitution valued the Union’s preservation. As a confederacy, the Articles of Confederation created an association of independent states. It was an inherently unstable and weak form of government.

Answer:

From research, I found that the hostility was similar, but racist policies were unofficial.

Explanation:

Hope this helps!

The hostility was similar, but racist policies were unofficial were race relations like outside the American South. Correct option is 2.

While segregation was not legally enforced to the same extent as in the Southern states, racial discrimination and prejudice against Black Americans were prevalent in other regions of the United States. However, the specific dynamics and manifestations of racism varied from region to region.

The Midwest and the West: Black Americans who migrated to the Midwest and the Western states often faced less overt segregation and legal restrictions than in the South. These regions attracted Black individuals seeking opportunities in industries such as agriculture, mining, and manufacturing. Although they experienced some degree of racial prejudice, they also encountered more tolerance and relatively fewer discriminatory laws compared to the Southern states.

Unofficial Racist Policies: While segregation was legally enforced in the South through Jim Crow laws, outside of the South, racism was often expressed through informal and unofficial means. Discrimination in employment, housing, education, and public accommodations persisted, but it was not explicitly mandated by law. This allowed for a more subtle and insidious form of racism that was not as immediately apparent as the overt segregation seen in the South.

Hostility and Racial Tensions: Racial tensions were present throughout the United States, even in regions where formal segregation was not prevalent. Black individuals often faced prejudice, discrimination, and social barriers to advancement and opportunities.

It is essential to recognize that racism was a nationwide issue, and Black Americans faced challenges and injustices across the country. While the legal framework of segregation was most prominent in the Southern states, racism was deeply ingrained in American society and institutions, regardless of the specific region. Overcoming racial prejudice and advancing civil rights for Black Americans required persistent activism, legal challenges, and social change efforts throughout the entire nation.

To know more about American:

https://brainly.com/question/21724440

#SPJ2

The United States is a federal system where the national government shares powers with individual state governments.

This has led to variations in laws across the country. Different states have enacted different laws based on their political ideologies, cultural values, and social norms. The implications of these laws can be significant, affecting the lives of millions of people living in those states.

For example, states have different laws regarding gun control, abortion, and marijuana legalization.

Arguments for gun control laws include reducing the number of gun-related deaths and increasing public safety, while arguments against include the protection of the Second Amendment right to bear arms and the potential infringement on individual freedoms.

Similarly, arguments for abortion rights include the right to bodily autonomy and the protection of women's health, while arguments against include the belief in the sanctity of life and the potential harm to the fetus.

In conclusion, the implications of laws in different states in America are vast and can have a significant impact on people's lives. Understanding the arguments for and against these laws is crucial in shaping public opinion and influencing the legislative process.

Read more about laws here:

https://brainly.com/question/25368237

#SPJ1

A command economy how is it different from the economy in the United States today in sense of the government controls about all aspects of the economy, including the production and distribution of goods and services, prices, and wages.

Corresponds to a mixed economy that combines elements of both market and command economies. In the US, the government does not control all aspects of the economy. Instead, the market plays a significant role in determining what goods and services are produced, how much they cost, and how they are distributed.

Therefore, the main difference between a command economy and the economy in the United States today is the level of government control. In the US, the government plays a more limited role and the market plays a larger role in determining economic outcomes.

Find out more about command economy at:

https://brainly.com/question/26262298

#SPJ1

Answer:

D (A producer makes its own food and a consumer is unable to make food.)

Explanation:

A plant would be a producer because it can make food by itself. A shark would be a consumer because it has to eat another animal for food because it can't make its own food.