In the case of Smith v Fifth Third Bank, regarding the class action lawsuit settlement reached by the parties involved, we can confirm the settlement payment is that of 5.2 million dollars.
The case of Smith v Fifth Third Bank was a class action lawsuit. A class-action suit is one in which the lawsuit is a collection of suits filed by many parties, which are tried as a single case, and the parties in question are represented by one member or group of members.
In the case mentioned the lawsuit resulted in a settlement. This is when the party being sued agrees to a payout in return for the charges being dropped. It is said that the Bank in question created a settlement fund to pay the members involved, which held a total of 5.2 million dollars to be paid to the victims.
To learn more visit:
https://brainly.com/question/16108643?referrer=searchResults
PLEASE HELP ME ASAPP
Carson is called to the scene of a murder. He brings his kit with him and begins to dust the area for fingerprints. Then he carefully puts a clear, special tape over possible prints to lift them off the surface. Carson puts the prints in his evidence bag to scan into the computer at the lab. What title would MOST likely describe Carson's profession? OA. criminologist B. criminalist C. criminal justice professional CD. jurist
Answer:
criminalist
Explanation:
Forensic science, also known as criminalistics, is the application of science to criminal and civil laws, mainly—on the criminal side—during criminal investigation, as governed by the legal standards of admissible evidence and criminal procedure.
The title that would doubtlessly depict Carson's profession is criminalist.Therefore, choice (B) is exact response.
A criminalist is a legal researcher who spends significant time in gathering, examining, and deciphering actual proof connected with criminal examinations. For this situation, Carson's activities of tidying for fingerprints, utilizing exceptional tape to lift the prints, and safeguarding the proof in a proof sack for additional examination demonstrate that he is associated with criminological examinations.
Criminalists assume a significant part in crime location examination, looking at proof to assist with recognizing suspects and add to settling criminal cases. They frequently work in legal research centers and team up with policing to offer logical help in criminal examinations.
Accordingly, choice (B) is exact response.
Learn more about criminalist, from:
brainly.com/question/31030668
#SPJ3
legal decisions made by judges in court cases are called
Answer:
These past decisions are called "case law", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "let the decision stand"—is the principle by which judges are bound to such past decisions.#StudyHars
#BrainlyEveryday
PLEASE HELP ME ASAP
Cheng's father has constantly told him to put his bike in the garage when he is not using it. After a long day of soccer practice, Cheng is tired and ready for dinner. He puts his bike next to the garage door but does not put it inside. The next morning, Cheng cannot find his bike anywhere. His father thinks that someone saw it outside and took it. Of what kind of crime is Cheng MOST likely a victim? O A. robbery B. larceny C. shoplifting OD. burglary
Answer:
(B) Robbery
Explanation:
cause he saw it and took it and that's stealing so robbery
As Cheng is a victim of larceny. Thus, the correct answer is option B.
What is a larceny?Larceny is a crime that involves the illegal taking or theft of another person's or business's personal property. It was an offence under English common law, and it became an offence in jurisdictions that incorporated English common law into their own law (also statutory law), where it is still in effect in many cases.
In England, Wales, Ireland, and Northern Ireland, the crime of larceny has been divided into the specific crimes of burglary, robbery, fraud, theft, and related crimes. Larceny, on the other hand, is still a crime in parts of the United States, Jersey, and New South Wales, Australia, involving the taking (caption) and carrying away (asportation) of personal property without the owner's consent.
As Cheng was warned by his father to put his bike in the garage when he is not using it. Still he does not put it inside, and the next morning, Cheng cannot find his bike anywhere.
Therefore, Cheng is most likely the victim of larceny, as it is a theft of personal property without the owner's consent.
To learn more about larceny, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/17612570
#SPJ2
Under California law, any person seeking relief for a breach of contract must do so within the time limits of the:
Answer:
action for cause occurring, which is limited to four years.
A(n) _____ is a court order forcing a person to do or not to do an act, such as violating a private restriction.
Answer:
Injunction.
A(n) injunction is a court order forcing a person to do or not to do an act, such as violating a private restriction.
I hope this helped at all.
The answer is injunction. An injunction is an authoritative warning or order. For example an injunction can force a company to stop dumping sewage into the waters system. This is forcing the company to not do the act, as it violates the private restriction.
I hope this helps! :)
Restraint use among younger novice drivers is
a)
b)
c)
Below average
Average
Above average
Answer:
A I think that's the answer
which act is violated if an employer refuses to provide health insurance to pregnant females due to the increased cost associated with their pregnancy?
Answer:
Congress enacted the "Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA)" in 1978 to make clear that discrimination based on pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions is a form of sex discrimination prohibited by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Explanation:
The Maternity Benefit Act of 1961 states that it is illegal for an employer to deny pregnant women health insurance due to the higher expense of their pregnancies.
What does the Maternity Benefit Act of 1961 mean?The Maternity Benefit Act of 1961 sought to: The Act's goals are to firstly give maternity benefits to women who work in specific establishments, and secondly it also set rules for how long they can be employed there before and after giving birth.
All organizations, plantations, including factories, businesses, government agencies, legislative bodies, and stores that are under the control of the national government are subject to the Maternity Benefit Act.
According to studies, having a sufficient maternity leave can reduce infant death rates, promote the mother's health, increase female labor force participation, and boost breastfeeding rates.
To learn more about the Maternity Benefit Act, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/14806632
#SPJ5
how does the requirement for probable cause to detain compare to the requirement for probable cause to go to trial
Answer:
Probable cause to detain requires fewer facts than does the decision to go to trial. The former refers to offenses where imprisonment is authorized but not required, while the latter refers to offenses that don't actually result in imprisonment.
Explanation:
legal decisions made by judges in court cases are called
Answer:
In law, a judgment, also spelled judgement, is a decision of a court regarding the rights and liabilities of parties in a legal action or proceeding.
Explanation:
PLEASE HELP ME ASAP
Andre is found murdered in the office of his construction company. His father began the company when Andre was a boy and several of Andre's brothers and cousins work for the company. After a lengthy investigation, detectives uncover evidence that Andre's brother James shot Andre in order to take his place as the manager of the company. Since the perpetrator was a member of Andre's family, what type of homicide would this be classified as? A. friendly homicide B. primary homicide OC. close homicide OD. secondary homicide
Answer:
primary homicide
Explanation:
instrumental crimes that involve premeditation and are less likely to be victim precipitated. False, primary homicides are expressive crimes that result from acts of interpersonal hostility. Who is involved in non primary homicides? Strangers, no prior relationship between victims and offenders
Since the perpetrator was a member of Andre's family, it is a type of primary homicide. The appropriate response is option B.
What is homicide?Homicide, or the killing of one person by another, The term "homicide" refers to both criminal and noncriminal killings, including murder, manslaughter, and various forms of homicide.
First-degree murder in the United States is defined as a homicide committed with intent or as part of a major offense (e.g., kidnapping). Less severe degrees of intent are required for second- and third-degree murder.
Noncriminal homicides include murders carried out in self- or other-defense as well as fatalities brought on by accidents caused by people acting lawfully.
Primary homicides are expressive crimes that are the outcome of hostile activities committed against other people. Who is responsible for secondary homicides? There is no history of acquaintance between the victims and the culprits.
Hence, the appropriate response is option B.
To learn more about homicide
https://brainly.com/question/28177539
#SPJ5
at what point can the defense move to end the case to end the case and for what cause?
Answer:
The majority of criminal cases terminate when a criminal defendant accepts a plea bargain offered by the prosecution. In a plea bargain, the defendant chooses to plead guilty before trial to the charged offenses, or to lesser charges in exchange for a more lenient sentence or the dismissal of related charges.
Compare what you know about paralegals with paralegals who are part of law shows on television. Make one statement about reading and gaining knowledge of paralegals and make one statement about paralegals portrayed in the media.
Paralegals, as I know them in person (and this may be in first person, or as experienced by a close acquaitance), do not command the kind of representation they are given in television shows.
Simply put, their job is to help lawyers do their job. The following include but are not a comprehensive list of what lawyers do:
Go for trials to defend their clients;Attend court hearings;initiate and or attend corporate and personal meetings; and sometimesget involved in police investigations etc.In the shows I have seen, they always seem smart, passionate about the cases they are working on, very ambitious, and always dressed in well-tailored corporate attire.
The reality that I have to accept is that:
Paralegals are not super-legal corporate figures. They are human too.Sometimes, they don't even love the job. For some, it's just another job to save up for their primary goalSome paralegals make very terrible mistakes. Not all of them are as smart as the job requires;They do not all dress for the part.People who are passionate about practicing law, perhaps, should read up about paralegals, and aim to practice as a paralegal before taking steps to become a lawyer.
I definitely would want the paralegals that I know to look and sound very smart like the ones often portrayed in the media.
Please read up more about paralegals here:
brainly.com/question/2763321
The Department of Labor (DOL) works to protect public health and safety.
bus
Decide if each item on the list is a DOL regulation (R) or enforcement activity (E).
Enforcement Regulation
1. Monitor workplaces to see if they are following safety and health standards.
2 Employers must use a certain method for calculating overtime pay.
3. Employers must record and report work-related fatalities, injuries, and illnesses.
4. Evaluate possible cancer-causing substances found in the workplace
5. Employees can file a charge if they feel they've been discriminated against
6. Educate employers about how to follow the Fair Labor Standards Act.
7. Make sure agricultural workers are receiving fair treatment required by law.
8. Employers must post a notice explaining laws about the minimum wage
Activity - Side
IVICS © 2019 iCivics, In
Answer:
1) no
2) yes
3) yes
4) no
5) no
6) yes
7) yes
8) yes
The ________________ is a law limiting the amount of time prosecutors have to bring criminal charges against a suspect after the crime has occurred.
Answer:
statute of limitations
Explanation:
mendel’s laws of segregation and independent assortment are based on the movement of chromosomes during meiosis, even though mendel did not know about chromosomes during his lifetime. can you match each of the following events with the law it illustrates?
According to Mendel, the law of segregation posits that an individual has two alleles and a parent typically passes only one allele to the offspring.
Your information is incomplete. Therefore, an overview of the law of segregation and independent assortment will be given. Mendel's Law of Independent Assortment implies that the inheritance of one gene is independent of the inheritance of the other pair.
It should be noted that the law of segregation and independent assortment are vital during meiotic division. Mendel's law of segregation simply entails how homologous chromosomes are separated in meiosis.
Learn more about laws of segregation on:
https://brainly.com/question/25783034
3 new laws to help the country
Answer:
1. You good sir/ma'am are president forever
2. Human experiments are illegal
(Not sure if they are already but oh well)
3. Netflix is either $10 or free
Explanation:
the – members of the texas legislature meet in regular session for – each odd-numbered year. in the 2019 legislative session, they successfully passed – of all proposed legislation.
Answer: 181 , 140 calendar days , less than 20 percent
Explanation:
our license will be suspended for failing, refusing, or neglecting to report an accident in which there is more than ________ worth of property damage, an injury, or a death. $300 $400 $550 $750
Answer:
Technichally all of them because, most license suspentions are due to failure to report an accident. Within 72 hours, every driver involved in a motor vehicle accident that causes death or injury, property damage of more than $1,500, or enough damage that any vehicle must be towed must file a written accident report with the DMV.
legal decisions made by judges in court cases are called
Answer:
A precedent.
Legal decisions made by judges in court cases are called precedents.
I hope this helped at all.
over time, the supreme court has been more restrictive in its protection of the right to privacy.
The Supreme Court has not become more restrictive in protecting the right to privacy, so this claim is false.
We can arrive at this answer because:
The Supreme Court understood that the right to privacy is essential to protect citizens, especially those involved in marginalized situations.For this reason, the Supreme Court decided to expand the privacy rights and not restrict them as shown in the question above.This supreme court attitude is intended to promote greater protection for individuals who are marginalized and who may suffer intolerant and life-threatening attacks.
More information:
https://brainly.com/question/1145825?referrer=searchResults
Features of the us constitution
Please help me!!!!!
Law books and articles that summarize, systematize, compile, explain, and interpret the law are called
Answer:
Are called secondary sources.
Law books and articles that summarize, systematize, compile, explain, and interpret the law are called secondary sources.
Other secondary sources are...
Biographies.Textbooks.Journal articles.A secondary source is a source that analyzes a specific event, but most of time, it is a historical event.
I hope this helped at all.
Assume a restaurant is forced to pay damages to a person who suffered food poisoning after eating at the restaurant. What type of law is involved
The type of law involved would be Private & Civil Law. Due to the fact that costumer did not die, there is no ability to charge for criminal law under manslaughter. The only paths available is to sue under Private and Civil Law. Remember, a private law is one that mainly involves lawsuits between private individuals or groups. In this case the restaurant and victim. Civil law is very similar, as it deals with members of the community and not criminals or governments.
I hope this helps! :)
PLEASE HELP ME ASAP
Ever since he was young, Kai was fascinated with fires. He loved to play with matches, eventually using kerosene or gasoline to create bigger fires. When Kai visits the library, all he can think about is how quickly the paper would go up in flames. He waits until it is after hours and throws a wadded-up cloth soaked with kerosene through one of the windows. Kai watches from the shadows as the building quickly goes up in flames. Firefighters arrive on the scene to put out the fire. Kai continues to watch as an ambulance pulls up and wonders if one of the firefighters has gotten a little to close to his flames. As Kai watches, firefighters bring out a body on a stretcher. Evidently someone was inside the library when the fire erupted and did not survive. When investigators track down Kai for starting the fire, what charge besides arson will he MOST likely face? OA. aggravated assault OB. first-degree murder C. second-degree murder OD. manslaughter
Answer:
The answer is D.
Explanation:
Manslaughter
Manslaughter is the charge besides arson will he most likely face. Hence, option D is correct.
What is meant by Manslaughter?Homicide is a broad category of crimes that includes manslaughter and murder. Manslaughter can be committed in three different ways: by killing with the intent to kill but where there is a partial defence, like loss of control; by assuming less responsibility; or by killing in accordance with a pact.
Those found guilty of murder must receive a life sentence from the court. Manslaughter carries no mandatory sentence, and the following are examples of possible punishments under UK law: a jail term of between two and ten years.
If parole is granted, a person serving a life sentence will spend the rest of their time under the PBC's supervision.
Thus, option D is correct.
For more information about Manslaughter, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/6228473
#SPJ2
PLEASE HELP ME ASAPP
To be found guilty of breaking the law, a prosecutor must prove that the person committed the crime. Once this is proven, the guilty verdict is rendered by the court. OA. True СВ. False
This is true because the prosecutor must have evidence to show to the court that this person, or suspect, was someone who broke this law. Without proof, the court cannot accuse the suspect of a wrong doing. Hope this helped, but who knows, im just a 7th grader, lol
Brainliest! Please help
Answer:
D) perpetrator
Explanation:
someone who carries out the act.
C IS THE ANSWER.
I HOPE IT IS HELPFUL
Over the past one hundred years business cycles have become more severe.
True or false
Some economists suggest they are, while others suggest it's the other way around: Longer expansions lead to more severe recessions. ... The most recent US business cycle has been remarkable in both its recession and expansion phases.
A business cycle represents fluctuations in the economy around full-employment output, but an economy's full-employment output, often called potential GDP, can also change. It grows over time due to population growth, growth in the economy's capital stock, and technological change.
Answer:
True.
Business cycles have been becoming expansive and severe, mostly in the U.S.The reason why it grows so much is because of the growth in the population, growth in the economy, and technological change.I hope this helped at all.
will give brainliest
thank you so much.......
Quick Help
5. Rick is about to stand trial, but he does not know what the charges are against him. _________________________________________________
6. Negan has been held in jail for three years without a trial. _________________________________________________
7. Keisha committed a crime in New York, but the punishment for the crime is harsher in Georgia, so the prosecutor organizes her case to be transferred to Georgia. _________________________________________________
8. Tyrell has selected a series of witnesses to examine which will attest to his client’s innocence. _________________________________________________
9. Though new evidence was found to convict Phillip after he was tried and found innocent, the prosecutor did not pursue a new trial. _________________________________________________
10. Sam cannot afford a lawyer, but the state appoints him one. _______________
Answer:
5. He can claim his miranda rights (the 5th amendment allows people to know what they are on trial for)
6. This is a violation of habeus corpus. Habeus corpus demands that a criminal be put on trial before being detained for actions. (Innocent until proven guilty)
7. 6th amendment protects the right to a speedy and public trial in the district in which the crime has been committed
8. 6th Amendment declares that all trials will have an impartial jury
9. Double Jeopardy in the 5th Amendment (can't be tried for the same thing twice)
10. 6th Amendment provides a lawyer for anyone who cannot provide one.
Explanation:
Holding people in jail without bond to ensure both their appearance at trial and the safety of the community is known as:
Answer:
The answer is Preventative Detention
Answer:
Holding people in jail without bond to ensure both their appearance at trial and the safety of the community is known as preventive detention.
I hope this helped at all.