Answer: electoral college function
compare and contrast the approaches of w.e.b. dubois and booker t. washington as they fought for african american civil rights. which man would you have supported? why?
When it came to plans for black social and economic advancement, W.E.B. Du Bois and Booker T. Washington had a strong disagreement. According to Du Bois, Black people should fight for equal rights.
Washington, meantime, had a conciliatory attitude towards African people. DuBois and George Washington were both African American leaders who fought for racial equality. DuBois espoused a paternalistic method of advancement, in contrast to Washington's hands-on exterior approach. Contrarily, Du Bois held that overt uprising was the only viable option. The fight for equality was led by W.E.B. Du Bois and Booker T. Washington. On the other hand, Washington believed DuBois caused more harm than good and simply served to enrage southern whites.
To know more about equal rights, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29761122
#SPJ4
One reason the ""land bridge"" theory is losing credibility is the fact that
Geneticist Jennifer Raff hypothesizes that early settlers to the Americas most likely traveled along what is known as the Kelp Highway rather than traversing the Bering Land Bridge on foot. The coastal route hypothesis is another name for this.
According to one scientific theory, the ancestors of today's Native Americans crossed this land bridge by foot before making their way south by following crevasses in the ice in pursuit of food. According to recent research, some people might have traveled by boat along prehistoric coasts.
The issue is that although the Bering land bridge theory continues to be by far the most widely accepted among archaeologists and paleogeneticists as to when and how Indigenous people first migrated to the Americas, the idea that the migration may have taken place "only" 14,500 years ago has been interpreted by the alt-right, the alt-lite, and many regular people as evidence that Indigenous peoples have no special claim to the hemisphere.
To learn more about Land Bridge Theory, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29470439
#SPJ4
colonization was extremely expensive. one of the major means the english used to offset the costs of this, most notably in the case of jamestown, was the use of:
The English used a variety of methods to offset the costs of colonization, most notably in the case of Jamestown.
One of these methods was the establishment of the Virginia Company of London, which was a joint-stock company that raised funds from investors to finance the settlement of Jamestown. The Virginia Company also provided incentives to settlers, such as land grants, to encourage immigration and settlement.
Additionally, the English government provided financial assistance and subsidies to the colony, and merchants and traders were able to make a profit by trading with the natives and selling goods to the colonists. Finally, the colonists were able to generate revenue through the cultivation of the land, the production of goods, and the sale of goods to England. Overall, the English used a combination of methods to offset the costs of colonization in Jamestown.
To know more about colonization, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30900919
#SPJ4
NEED HELP ASAP - Nativism
1. Definition: Your definition of nativism in your own words.
2. Characteristics: Key ideas or features that makes up nativism.
3. Examples/Models: Examples of nativism from around the world.
4. Non-Examples: Examples from around the world of what nativism is not.
Answer:
1.Nativism is a political and social ideology that emphasizes the interests and rights of native-born inhabitants over those of immigrants.
2.
The key ideas that make up nativism include:
Cultural superiority: Nativists believe that their own culture is superior to that of other cultures and that immigrants pose a threat to their way of life.
Economic protectionism: Nativists often advocate for policies that protect native-born workers and businesses, such as tariffs and immigration restrictions.
Xenophobia: Nativists are often fearful or hostile towards immigrants, particularly those from cultures that are perceived as different or threatening.
Nationalism: Nativism is often associated with a strong sense of national identity and a desire to protect that identity from outside influences.
Anti-immigration sentiment: Nativists generally support restrictive immigration policies, including stricter border controls, deportation of undocumented immigrants, and limits on legal immigration.
3.
Nativism has been a part of American political and social discourse since the colonial era. Some historical examples of nativism in the United States include:
The Know-Nothing Party: This was a political party that emerged in the 1850s and was primarily focused on limiting the political power and influence of immigrants, particularly Catholics.
The Chinese Exclusion Act: This federal law, passed in 1882, prohibited Chinese immigrants from coming to the United States and was the first significant federal law restricting immigration.
The Immigration Act of 1924: This law established quotas on the number of immigrants who could enter the United States from various countries and favored immigrants from Western and Northern Europe over those from Southern and Eastern Europe.
The Red Scare: This was a period of intense anti-communist hysteria in the United States during the 1940s and 1950s that led to the persecution of many immigrants, particularly those from Eastern Europe and Asia.
The modern anti-immigrant movement: In recent years, nativist sentiment has been fueled by concerns about illegal immigration, particularly from Latin America and the Middle East, and has led to the rise of groups like the Minutemen and the Tea Party.
4. Some examples of things that are not considered nativism include:
A preference for one's own cultural traditions: While many nativists do believe in the superiority of their own culture, simply valuing one's own cultural traditions is not the same as nativism.
Support for border security or immigration enforcement: While nativists often advocate for stricter border controls and tougher immigration policies, not all supporters of these measures are motivated by nativist sentiment.
Concerns about national security: While fears of terrorism or other threats to national security can sometimes overlap with nativist sentiment, not all such concerns are rooted in a desire to protect native-born inhabitants at the expense of immigrants.
Advocacy for assimilation or integration: While some nativists may call for immigrants to assimilate or integrate into American society, this is not inherently a nativist idea and can be motivated by a desire for social cohesion or cultural harmony.
Criticism of specific immigration policies: While some critics of specific immigration policies may be labeled as nativists, it is important to evaluate their arguments on their own merits rather than assuming that all criticism of immigration is motivated by nativist sentiment.
A ship lost at sea for many days suddenly sighted a friendly vessel. From the mast of the unfortunate vessel was seen a signal, “Water, water; we die of thirst!” The answer from the friendly vessel at once came back, “Cast down your bucket where you are.” A second time the signal, “Water, water; send us water!” ran up from the distressed vessel, and was answered, “Cast down your bucket where you are.” And a third and fourth signal for water was answered, “Cast down your bucket where you are.” The captain of the distressed vessel, at last heeding the injunction, cast down his bucket, and it came up full of fresh, sparkling water from the mouth of the Amazon River. To those of my race who depend on bettering their condition in a foreign land or who underestimate the importance of cultivating friendly relations with the Southern white man, who is their next-door neighbor, I would say: “Cast down your bucket where you are”— cast it down in making friends in every manly way of the people of all races by whom we are surrounded."
Booker T. Washington, 1895
In this passage, Washington is urging African Americans to
Washington exhorts African Americans to collaborate more directly with whites throughout the South in this text. (option B)
What does he urge?In a well-known speech delivered in Atlanta in 1895, Washington advised African Americans to "lay down their buckets wherever you are. or to stay in the South with Jim Crow laws and put up with racial prejudice rather than making what he saw as impolite demands for equality.
Jesse Jackson became the initial major-party black contender to undertake nationwide primary campaign and win individual state primaries or caucuses in the presidential elections of 1984 and 1988. He ran for office as a Democrat.
To know more about African Americans visit:
https://brainly.com/question/24318057
#SPJ1
Complete question: A ship that had been stranded at sea for days finally spotted a friendly ship. "Water, water; i die of thirst!" was signalled from the sad vessel's mast. The friendly vessel immediately responded, "Throw down your pail where you are." When the distressed ship cried out a second time, "Water, liquid; send us water," the response was "Throw down the bucket wherever you are. "Throw down the bucket where you are," was the response to a third and a fourth signal for water. When the captain of the struggling ship finally paid attention to the warning, he cast down his bucket and it was filled with clean, sparkling water from of the mouth of a Amazon River. Those who are my Cast down ones bucket where you are—cast it down in forming friendships in every manly way with the people of all races by which we are surrounded—to those of any race who rely on improving their condition in a foreign country or who undervalue the significance of cultivating cordial relations with Southern white man who is their next-door neighbour.
Booker T. Washington, 1895
In this passage, Washington is urging African Americans to
A) start a new life in South America.
B) work more with whites in the South.
C) start a revolution against United States.
D) form groups fight against the Ku Klux Klan.
B) work more with whites in the South.
What laws came into effect because of such writings as The Cry of the Children ?
Answer:
These laws gradually shortened work hours, improved working conditions, and raised the age at which children could work. Eventually, the U.S. passed the Fair Labor Standards Act in 1938, which set the minimum working age to 16 during school hours, 14 for certain after-school jobs, and 18 for more dangerous jobs.
all of the following were arguments made against the davis administration by its opponents except: a) the davis administration was corrupt b) the davis administration's policies led to excessive taxation c) the davis administration used the state police and state militia to ensure dictatorial rule over texas d) the davis administration cared little for the civil rights of the freed slaves
Answer:
The argument that was NOT made against the Davis administration by its opponents is:
a) The Davis administration was corrupt.
The argument that was not made against the Davis Administration by its opponents is that d) "the Davis administration cared little for the civil rights of the freed slaves".
The Davis Administration was established in Texas at the conclusion of the Civil War. Union troops were occupying Texas, and the Davis administration was tasked with governing a state that was attempting to heal from the wounds of conflict.
There were various opposition groups and individuals who rose up against the Davis administration, making the following accusations and allegations about its administration:
a) The Davis Administration was corrupt: Accusations of corruption were widespread throughout the administration.
b) The Davis administration's policies led to excessive taxation: The policies implemented by the Davis Administration were accused of being the cause of excessive taxation.
c) The Davis Administration used the state police and state militia to ensure dictatorial rule over Texas: One of the Davis administration's primary faults was seen as its usage of the state police and state militia to maintain dictatorial rule over Texas.
d) The Davis administration cared little for the civil rights of the freed slaves: This is not an argument made against the Davis administration by its opponents. The correct answer is d) the Davis administration cared little for the civil rights of the freed slaves.
You can learn more about Davis administration at
https://brainly.com/question/5239695
#SPJ11
in response to the sinking of the lusitania, woodrow wilson a. denounced british violations of neutrality rights. b. demanded the immediate end to submarine warfare. c. ordered a new battleship-building program. d. called on congress to declare war on germany.
Submarine warfare had to halt right away after the passenger ship Lusitania sank. Wilson sought an apology from Germany and maintained his impartial stance for as long as he could. Hence (b) is the colrrect option.
Yet the unrestrained submarine warfare of Germany was an unforgivable insult to American pride and dignity. Theodore Roosevelt sought immediate action, while President Woodrow Wilson preferred to move cautiously and maintain his neutrality. Germany supported its aggression by arguing that Lusitania had transported weapons and other supplies for the war and was thus fair game. Britain and the United States were horrified by the sinking of the Lusitania and denounced it as a flagrant infraction of the prohibition on attacks on passenger ships set forth by international law.
To know more about sank, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30236549
#SPJ4
In response to the sinking of the lusitania, woodrow wilson:
a. denounced british violations of neutrality rights.
b. demanded the immediate end to submarine warfare.
c. ordered a new battleship-building program.
d. called on congress to declare war on germany.
What conditions in Germany exist which contribute to Hitler and the Nazi party seizing control of the German government?
Answer:
Adolf Hitler (April 20, 1889 - April 30, 1945) was appointed chancellor of Germany in 1933 following a series of electoral victories by the Nazi Party. He ruled absolutely until his death . Upon achieving power, Hitler smashed the nation’s democratic institutions and transformed Germany into a war state intent on conquering Europe for the benefit of the so-called Aryan race. His invasion of Poland on September 1, 1939, triggered the European phase of World War II.
Explanation:
3. What are some policies toward Jews that were instituted by the Nazis? What was the goal
of the Holocaust?
Antisemitism and the persecution of Jews were the main/central tenets of the Nazi ideology.
In 1920, the Nazi Party members publicly declared their intention to segregate Jews from “The Aryan” society and to abrogate their political, legal, and civil rights.
The goal of the holocaust was to get rid of the Jew minority, ROMAs and other minorities that were not German, per short the goal was to create a Nazi Germany with just ethnic Germans.
Policies:
German law restricted the number of Jewish students at German schools and universities.
Government agencies at all levels aimed to exclude Jews from the economic sphere of Germany by preventing them from earning a living.
In 1937 and 1938, German authorities again stepped up legislative persecution of German Jews, starting the "Holocaust"
Hope this was enough, Brainliest would be much appreciated.
3. Briefly describe the crisis of Social Security today.
The crisis of Social Security today refers to the financial challenges faced by the Social Security system in the United States. The Social Security program, which provides retirement, disability, and survivor benefits to millions of Americans, is facing a funding shortfall due to a combination of factors such as demographic changes, longer life expectancy, declining birth rates, and increasing healthcare costs. The number of retirees has been increasing, while the number of workers paying into the system has been decreasing. This has put a strain on the Social Security Trust Fund, which is projected to be depleted by 2033, unless action is taken to address the issue. If this happens, benefits may have to be reduced by as much as 25% or taxes increased to maintain the program's solvency. The crisis of Social Security today is a complex issue that requires a comprehensive solution to ensure the financial stability of the program for future generations.
You said to open it briefly, but it was such an explanation, sorry
how did fritz harkort influence the nature of economic development in nineteenth-century germany?
Answer:Industrialization in Germany was the phase of the breakthrough of industrialization in Germany, beginning at the time from around 1815 to 1835.
Fritz Harkort significantly influenced the nature of economic development in nineteenth-century Germany through his pioneering work in the industrial sector.
Here's a step-by-step explanation of his contributions:
1. Early career: Harkort was a successful businessman who began his career as a merchant, gaining experience in trade and manufacturing.
2. Embracing technology: Harkort was an early advocate for the use of technology in industry. He recognized the potential of steam power and machine manufacturing, which led him to invest in and promote these technologies in Germany.
3. Founding Harkort'sche Maschinenbau-Anstalt: In 1819, Harkort founded Harkort'sche Maschinenbau-Anstalt, a pioneering engineering firm that specialized in the production of steam engines and other machinery. This was one of the first companies of its kind in Germany and played a crucial role in the country's industrialization.
4. Railway industry: Harkort's company was also involved in the development of the railway industry in Germany, further supporting economic growth and the expansion of trade networks.
5. Political influence: In addition to his business endeavors, Harkort was an influential politician who advocated for economic policies that supported industrialization and economic development. He served as a member of the Prussian National Assembly and the Erfurt Parliament, promoting progressive economic policies.
6. Legacy: Fritz Harkort's contributions to the industrialization of Germany during the nineteenth century laid the groundwork for the country's economic growth and modernization. His emphasis on technological innovation and investment in industry was crucial to Germany's transformation into an economic powerhouse.
In summary, Fritz Harkort's influence on economic development in nineteenth-century Germany was through his support of technological innovation, investment in industry, and political advocacy for progressive economic policies. His work helped to establish Germany as a leading industrial nation during this time.\
For more about economic development:
https://brainly.com/question/16299816
#SPJ11
what emerged as the core concerns of the webster-hayne debate? multiple select question. nullification settlement of the west states' rights
The core concerns of the Webster-Hayne debate were states' rights and nullification. So the answer is states' rights and nullification.
The core concerns of the Webster-Hayne debate as follows :
States' Rights: This was a central issue in the debate, with Hayne arguing that states had the right to nullify federal laws they deemed unconstitutional, while Webster argued that the federal government had ultimate authority and that the Constitution was a compact between the states and the federal government.
Nullification: Hayne argued that nullification was a legitimate means for states to resist federal authority, while Webster argued that nullification was unconstitutional and would lead to the dissolution of the Union.
Therefore, the correct answer is: States' Rights and Nullification. Settlement of the West was not a core concern of the Webster-Hayne debate.
For more questions on: nullification
https://brainly.com/question/887694
#SPJ11
Who helped the Spaniards build their new cities and structures?
Answer:
One group of people who helped the Spaniards build their new cities and structures were the indigenous people of the Americas. They provided labor and expertise in construction, as well as knowledge of local materials and building techniques. However, it's important to note that this labor was often coerced or forced through colonialism and exploitation.
2. According to the United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs, why are nuclear weapons such a threat?
>
3. When was the only time nuclear weapons were used in combat?
>
4. What does Emperor Hirohito’s statement during his surrender speech reveal about the impact of nuclear weapons?
>
A city might be entirely destroyed, which could kill millions of people and put the environment and the lives of future generations in peril owing to its long-lasting, catastrophic effects. These weapons are hazardous by virtue of their very existence.
What does the United Nations' Nuclear Weapons Treaty truly say?With a vote of 122 States in favor, one against, and one abstention, the UN Conference approved the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons on July 7, 2017, and on September 20, 2017, it was officially made open for signature.
When were nuclear weapons first employed in conflict?The sole instance of such use is when nuclear weapons were used against Japan by the United States in the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945, at the conclusion of the war.
Nuclear warheads are allegedly still in existence today, and more than 2,000 nuclear tests have been conducted, despite the fact that nuclear weapons have only ever been deployed in conflict twice—in the 1945 bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
How did Hirohito feel about the atomic bomb?Hirohito was informed more than 12 hours after the bombing and the destruction of Hiroshima. He thought the conflict had "become untenable to continue" two days later, according to the records, and desired it would end "as quickly as possible." He was compelled to take action as a result of the devastation brought on by nuclear weapons, the final collapse, the annihilation of Japan, and the total extermination of human civilisation.
Learn more about Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons: https://brainly.com/question/31033759
#SPJ1
all the shared structures that both the Kutchicetus and the Saber-toothed cat have in common
Answer:, it is not possible to identify any shared structures between Kutchicetus and Saber-toothed cats as they belong to completely different groups with distinct anatomical features and adaptations.
Explanation:Kutchicetus is an extinct cetacean, believed to have lived during the Eocene epoch, around 48 million years ago. Saber-toothed cats, on the other hand, are a group of extinct predatory mammals belonging to the family Felidae, characterized by their long, curved canine teeth. While there are no shared structures between the two groups, there are a few anatomical features that are unique to each group.
Kutchicetus had several adaptations for an aquatic lifestyle, including a streamlined body, paddle-like forelimbs, and a powerful tail for propulsion. It also had nostrils positioned high up on the skull, indicating that it breathed air at the surface of the water. Saber-toothed cats, on the other hand, were terrestrial predators with elongated canine teeth used for killing prey.
Please help quick I’ll mark brainly
The sudden halt to the Chinese treasure voyages to the Indian Ocean left a door open for the Portuguese to dominate trading there a century later. Once the Portuguese established their dominance in the Indian Ocean, they traveled farther east and established port cities along the Chinese coastline. Later, the Portuguese influence was replaced by the British and Dutch whose imperialism led to the claiming of previously independent Asian nations as colonies of England and the Netherlands. Do you think this timeline of events would have continued had the Chinese remained present and dominant in the Indian Ocean?
If the Chinese had maintained their dominance in Indian Ocean, it is possible that they could have established trade relationships and port cities along the East African coast and in the Arabian Peninsula.
What is trade?Trade refers to exchange of goods, the services, or resources between individuals, businesses, or the nations. The purpose of trade is to fulfill the needs and wants of the parties involved and achieve mutual benefit. Trade can take place locally, nationally, or internationally, and can involve physical or digital goods and services. Trade can be conducted through various means, including bartering, buying and selling, or exchanging resources. Trade has played a significant role in human history, driving economic growth, cultural exchange, and technological advancements. It has also been a source of conflict and competition, leading to trade wars and protectionist policies. Today, international trade is governed by various regulations and agreements, such as the World Trade Organization, to ensure fair and equitable trade practices and promote economic development.
To learn more about trade, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/17175941
#SPJ1
40. In Ms. Morales’s class, the ratio of boys to girls is 3:7. The class sizes at Ms. Morales’s school range from 22 to 34 students per class. What is the total number of students in Ms. Morales’s class? A. 21 students B. 24 students C. 28 students D. 30 students
Answer: answer D 30 students
Explanation:
i brainly'd it :)
What type of document is this?Why might Kennedy have chosen to deliver it as a televised speech ?
Kennedy's choice to give speeches on television was motivated by his desire to speak directly to the American people, bypassing the news media's filter.
Why was President Kennedy so famous?Kennedy was renowned for his persuasive oratory and ability to relate to the American people. He frequently used televised speeches and news conferences to present his ideas and policies to the general public. He was the first president to completely understand the power of television as a medium for reaching the masses.
How does President Kennedy handle the Cuban Missile Crisis?The Cuban Missile Crisis was a major diplomatic and military standoff between the United States and the Soviet Union in October 1962, when the US discovered that the Soviet Union had installed nuclear missiles in Cuba. President Kennedy chose a diplomatic solution, announcing a naval blockade of Cuba to prevent further Soviet shipments of weapons. This move was seen as a bold and risky one, but it ultimately forced the Soviet Union to back down and remove the missiles.
To learn more about president Kennedy visit:
brainly.com/question/23808683
#SPJ1
Based on the evidence, do you think it's likely that Nixon was also involved in the planning or ordering the break-in? Explain
3 - The Constitution gives Congress the power to impeach and try a president for "Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors." Do you think the evidence would have warranted an impeachment and conviction for Nixon? Explain.
4 - In a 1977 interview with British journalist David Frost, Nixon made the argument that a president is allowed to commit illegal acts if they are done to promote the good of the country. Do you agree that a president should be allowed to break the law for the good of the country? Explain
Answer:
Based on the evidence, do you think it's likely that Nixon was also involved in the planning or ordering the break-in? Explain There is strong evidence that suggests Nixon was involved in the cover-up of the break-in, but it is still unclear whether he was directly involved in the planning or ordering of it. Further investigation and evidence may be needed to make a definitive conclusion. 3 - The Constitution gives Congress the power to impeach and try a president for "Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors." Do you think the evidence would have warranted an impeachment and conviction for Nixon? Explain. The evidence against Nixon, including the Watergate scandal and obstruction of justice, was significant and could have warranted an impeachment and conviction. However, without further investigation and a fair trial, it is impossible to make a definitive conclusion.
4 - In a 1977 interview with British journalist David Frost, Nixon made the argument that a president is allowed to commit illegal acts if they are done to promote the good of the country. Do you agree that a president should be allowed to break the law for the good of the country? Explain This argument raises important ethical and legal questions about the balance between national security and individual rights. It is crucial to carefully consider the potential consequences of allowing a president to break the law in certain circumstances before coming to a conclusion.
Explanation:
Based on the evidence, Nixon may or may not be involved in the planning or ordering the break -in.
Although there is compelling evidence that Nixon was engaged in the cover-up of the break-in, it is still unknown if he was personally responsible for its conception or execution.
To get a firm judgement, further research and proof may be required.
3. Do you think the evidence would have warranted an impeachment and conviction for Nixon?
The Watergate affair and other relevant charges against Nixon may have supported an impeachment and conviction. Yet it is hard to draw a firm judgement without more research and a fair trial.4. Do you agree that a president should be allowed to break the law for the good of the country?
The balance between individual rights and national security is a significant ethical and legal issue that is brought up by this debate.
When making a decision, it is essential to carefully weigh the possible repercussions of permitting a president to breach the law in specific situations.
To know more about Constitution visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29799909
#SPJ1
which statement best represents colonial attitudes toward independence in the aftermath of the battle of bunker hill?
The statement that best represents colonial attitudes toward independence in the aftermath of the Battle of Bunker Hill is: "The colonies gained confidence in their ability to challenge British military power and started to believe that they could achieve independence."
This statement is true because while the colonists had shown great determination in the Battle of Bunker Hill, they were still not ready to declare independence from Great Britain. However, they were determined to defend their rights and were willing to fight for them. The battle had shown them that they were capable of standing up to the British army and that they had a chance of winning the war if they continued to fight.
Therefore the answer is The colonies gained confidence in their ability to challenge British military power and started to believe that they could achieve independence."
For more questions on: independence
https://brainly.com/question/1685775
#SPJ11
The United Nations needs permission to take action. How is this a good thing?
On the flip side, how is this a bad thing?
The question is answered in two parts. How is this a good thing, and how is it a bad thing?
The Good:
The United Nations in getting permission ensures that the UN will not act out of line, and that it is agreed that the action is warranted to keep global peace.
The Bad:
The United Nations needs roughly around 2/3 of votes to pass any resolutions, and they must pass through the security council, which contains China, France, Russia, UK, and US, in which, if any one of them vetoes the resolution, the resolution is not standing.
~
To wrap things up, it is good for the United Nations to need permission to ensure that they do not do anything rash, while it may be bad in that action which may have been warranted is disregarded because it fails the vote, either in the general assembly or through any one of the security council. It is important to note that in today's world, China and Russia do not align policy wise with France, UK, or US.
~
Learn more about the United Nations, here:
https://brainly.com/question/9763405
explain one way in which nationalist movements in southeast asia were similar to nationalist movements in south american states in the period 1750-1900
One way in which nationalist movements in southeast Asia were similar to nationalist movements in south American states in the period 1750-1900 is Nationalist movements were comparable in that they were resolved to identify as who they truly were and were not willing to be Westernized.
Both movements began with the shared goal of gaining independence from foreign control, and people were joined on the basis of cultural or regional similarities. The nationalism movement in South America began with the goal of freeing the country from colonial control and making itself free from the dominance of foreign marketplaces and goods. This began with the regionalism movement, which brought individuals together on the premise of regional belonging.
South Asia's nationalism movement began with the same goal of liberating themselves from foreign control and was unified by culture and faith.
To learn more about nationalist movements:
https://brainly.com/question/14728763
#SPJ4
Both Southeast Asian and South American nationalist movements sought to challenge the colonial rule and assert their own cultural and political identities in the face of external domination.
Nationalist groups in Southeast Asia and South America fought against European colonial forces in comparable ways between 1750 and 1900. Both areas were colonised and exploited by European powers, resulting in a wish for political and cultural independence. In the face of external dominance, nationalist groups in both areas tried to challenge colonial authority and establish their own cultural and political identities.
This included the establishment of new governments, the support of indigenous languages and customs, and the growth of national economies. Both regions struggled for independence for extended periods, with different degrees of success.
Learn more about nationalist movements:
https://brainly.com/question/30616779
#SPJ4
Which statement BEST explains how the Emancipation Proclamation did not account for all possible outcomes?
A
There was no caveat in the event that the Confederates won the Civil War.
B
There was no contingency plan for how abolishing slavery would affect the economy.
C
There was seemingly no plan to free the slaves if the rebellious Confederate states rejoined the Union.
D
There were no policies in place regulating how newly freed slaves would earn a salary or where they would live.
In the event that the Confederates prevailed in the Civil War, there was no exception.
What was the Emancipation Proclamation's primary flaw?Yet, because the Emancipation Proclamation was a military action, it came with a lot of limitations. Slavery didn't stop in the border states of allies; only those that had left the Union were impacted. However, it expressly left out Confederate states that were already ruled by the Union.
Why didn't slavery cease with the Emancipation Proclamation?Despite having such broad language, the Emancipation Proclamation had significant restrictions. Slavery in the ally border states was unaffected because it only applied to those that had left the Union. Additionally, it specifically excluded regions of the Confederacy that were already under Northern rule.
To know more about Civil War visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/11874600
#SPJ1
what was one disadvantage to keeping Mouschi, Peteres cat
One disadvantage to keeping Mouschi, Peteres cat, was the cost of care. Cats require regular veterinary checkups, vaccinations, flea and worm treatments, and other preventive care.
They also need good quality food, litter, and other supplies. All of these things can add up to a significant expense over the course of a cat's life. In addition, cats are prone to certain health problems that can require costly treatments, such as diabetes, kidney disease, and cancer.
Additionally, if the cat has an accident or gets sick, the cost of medical care can be quite high. Finally, cats can be destructive, scratching furniture, destroying curtains and carpets, and even damaging walls. The cost of repairing and replacing damaged items can add up quickly.
To know more about Cats, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/14361255
#SPJ4
What did Pittsburgh have to offer black?
briefly explain one major difference between williams's and gaddis's interpretations of the origins of the cold war.
One major difference between Williams's and Gaddis's interpretations of the origins of the Cold War is their view on the responsibility for the conflict.
Williams argues that the United States was primarily responsible for the onset of the Cold War due to its expansionist economic policies, such as the Marshall Plan and the Truman Doctrine, which threatened the Soviet Union's security and interests. He also emphasizes the role of ideology in shaping US foreign policy, particularly the belief in American exceptionalism and the need to spread capitalism and democracy globally.
Learn more about Gaddis's interpretations
https://brainly.com/question/23965186
#SPJ4
What determines the climate of United States ?
Answer: The climate of the United States varies due to changes in latitude, and a range of geographic features, including mountains and deserts. Generally, on the mainland, the climate of the U.S. becomes warmer the further south one travels, and drier the further west, until one reaches the West Coast.
Explanation:
Hope this was helpful!<3
Who became the first Congress leader in the 1900's?
What was the "final stage" of communism under Mao Zedong.
A. world domination
B. classless society
C. defeating the USSR
D. the death of Mao Zedong
Answer: D
Explanation: