Answer:
The Declaration of Independence can be considered a declaration of war, but not in the traditional sense of declaring war against another country. Rather, it is a declaration of war against the British government's authority over the American colonies.
Explanation:
The text of the Declaration of Independence includes several statements that indicate a willingness to use force to secure American independence. For example, the opening sentence declares that "When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another...they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation." This suggests that the American people have decided that it is necessary to break away from British rule and are willing to take action to achieve that goal.
Additionally, the Declaration includes language that suggests a readiness to use military force to defend the new nation. For instance, the document declares that "we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor" in order to secure independence. This statement implies that the signers of the Declaration are willing to risk their lives and wealth to defend their new nation if necessary.
Overall, while the Declaration of Independence is not a formal declaration of war against another country, it can be seen as a declaration of war against British authority over the American colonies, and a willingness to use force to secure American independence.
The Declaration of Independence cannot be considered a declaration of war. It is a statement that explains the reasons for the 13 American colonies' decision to separate from British rule and form their own nation.
However, it does list various grievances against the British government, which contributed to the American Revolutionary War. In the text, the Declaration outlines specific complaints against King George III and the British government, such as imposing taxes without the colonies' consent, quartering troops among the population, and limiting their trade. These grievances justify the colonies' decision to break away from British rule, but they do not explicitly declare war.
The main purpose of the Declaration of Independence is to assert the colonies' right to self-governance and freedom, as stated in the famous line, "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
In conclusion, while the Declaration of Independence was a significant factor in the American Revolutionary War, it is not a declaration of war itself. It is a statement of principles and grievances that led the colonies to seek independence and form their own nation.
For more about Declaration:
https://brainly.com/question/30724602
#SPJ11
all the shared structures that both the Kutchicetus and the Saber-toothed cat have in common
Answer:, it is not possible to identify any shared structures between Kutchicetus and Saber-toothed cats as they belong to completely different groups with distinct anatomical features and adaptations.
Explanation:Kutchicetus is an extinct cetacean, believed to have lived during the Eocene epoch, around 48 million years ago. Saber-toothed cats, on the other hand, are a group of extinct predatory mammals belonging to the family Felidae, characterized by their long, curved canine teeth. While there are no shared structures between the two groups, there are a few anatomical features that are unique to each group.
Kutchicetus had several adaptations for an aquatic lifestyle, including a streamlined body, paddle-like forelimbs, and a powerful tail for propulsion. It also had nostrils positioned high up on the skull, indicating that it breathed air at the surface of the water. Saber-toothed cats, on the other hand, were terrestrial predators with elongated canine teeth used for killing prey.
which statement best represents colonial attitudes toward independence in the aftermath of the battle of bunker hill?
The statement that best represents colonial attitudes toward independence in the aftermath of the Battle of Bunker Hill is: "The colonies gained confidence in their ability to challenge British military power and started to believe that they could achieve independence."
This statement is true because while the colonists had shown great determination in the Battle of Bunker Hill, they were still not ready to declare independence from Great Britain. However, they were determined to defend their rights and were willing to fight for them. The battle had shown them that they were capable of standing up to the British army and that they had a chance of winning the war if they continued to fight.
Therefore the answer is The colonies gained confidence in their ability to challenge British military power and started to believe that they could achieve independence."
For more questions on: independence
https://brainly.com/question/1685775
#SPJ11
how did world war 1 changed american history
Hello can anyone answer the questions 10-12. I would appreciate all the help I can get! Have a blessed day:)
The German submarines (U-boat) U-20 attacked and sunk the British cruise liner Lusitania on May 7, 1915.
Was the Lusitania's captain held accountable?Bluebell pulled Captain Turner out of the sea. Turner was purportedly to blame for the loss of the Lusitania, but the Mersey Inquiry subsequent Mayer proceedings from New York City to Liverpool, England, cleared Turner.
What was the Lusitania controversy?The sinking incident has also been a source of debate, with theories that the Lusitania may have been put in danger on purpose to draw the United States into the conflict and that her cargo may have contained unreported war armaments.
To know more about Lusitania visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29232786
#SPJ1
How did the assassination of Abraham Lincoln impact the Civil War?
Confederate states agreed to free all enslaved persons in their territory.
Confederate president Jefferson Davis ordered General Lee to resume fighting.
The Union army attacked southern cities and towns to retaliate for his death.
The task of Reconstruction was passed to President Andrew Johnson.
The assignment of Reconstruction was passed to President Andrew Johnson is the effect the Nationwide conflict after the death of Abraham Lincoln . Option D is correct .
How was Reconstruction affected by Lincoln's assassination?Radical Republicans were able to influence Reconstruction to impose much harsher punishments on the former Confederate States thanks to Lincoln's assassination.
While white Southerners experienced something closer to a sense of reprieve from Union dominance, they still worried about the future of the Confederate states, while black Southerners sincerely mourned Lincoln's death.
How did Abraham Lincoln affect the Nationwide conflict?As President, he incorporated the Conservative Faction into a solid public association. He signed the Emancipation Proclamation on January 1, 1863, making slaves in the Confederacy free forever.
To learn more about Lincoln visit :
https://brainly.com/question/28711052
#SPJ1
compare and contrast the approaches of w.e.b. dubois and booker t. washington as they fought for african american civil rights. which man would you have supported? why?
When it came to plans for black social and economic advancement, W.E.B. Du Bois and Booker T. Washington had a strong disagreement. According to Du Bois, Black people should fight for equal rights.
Washington, meantime, had a conciliatory attitude towards African people. DuBois and George Washington were both African American leaders who fought for racial equality. DuBois espoused a paternalistic method of advancement, in contrast to Washington's hands-on exterior approach. Contrarily, Du Bois held that overt uprising was the only viable option. The fight for equality was led by W.E.B. Du Bois and Booker T. Washington. On the other hand, Washington believed DuBois caused more harm than good and simply served to enrage southern whites.
To know more about equal rights, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29761122
#SPJ4
Exhibit Requirements
4
• One section (or slide if making a presentation) for Ghana with the most prominent features of its civilization, along with a
thorough explanation of what made one of the features historically significant.
• One section (or slide if making a presentation) for Mali with the most prominent features of its civilization, along with a
thorough explanation of what made one of the features historically significant.
• One section (or slide if making a presentation) for Songhai with the most prominent features of its civilization, along with a
thorough explanation of what made one of the features historically significant.
• One artifact/image for each kingdom
• In your explanations above, you should both explain what the feature was and why it was so significant. This could be a new
religion, a new source of economic wealth, or the fall of a dynasty in political power.
Here are the exhibit requirements for each of the three kingdoms along with explanations of their most prominent features and historically significant events:
Ghana:Ghana was a powerful kingdom in West Africa that flourished between the 6th and 13th centuries. Its most prominent feature was its wealth, which came from controlling the trans-Saharan trade routes that connected West Africa with North Africa and the Mediterranean world. The kingdom's position at the center of this trade network allowed it to accumulate vast amounts of gold, which it traded for salt, cloth, and other goods.
One historically significant event in Ghana's history was its conversion to Islam in the 11th century. Islam spread through the region as a result of trade contacts with Muslim merchants from North Africa and the Middle East.
By embracing Islam, Ghana's rulers gained access to new sources of knowledge and prestige, as well as new trade connections with Muslim communities around the world.
Artifact/Image: The Kumbi Saleh ruins, the former capital of the Ghana Empire, located in present-day Mauritania.
Mali:Mali was a powerful kingdom in West Africa that succeeded Ghana in the 13th century. Its most prominent feature was its immense wealth, which was derived from controlling the gold mines of West Africa and the trans-Saharan trade routes. Mali's most famous ruler, Mansa Musa, was one of the richest people in history and is said to have distributed vast amounts of gold on his pilgrimage to Mecca in the 14th century.
One historically significant event in Mali's history was the establishment of Timbuktu as a center of Islamic scholarship and trade in the 14th century. Timbuktu became a hub for the trans-Saharan trade and a center for Islamic learning, attracting scholars from across West Africa and beyond. The kingdom's wealth and power were further enhanced by its control over the gold mines of Bambuk and Bure.
Artifact/Image: The Great Mosque of Djenné, a famous example of Sudano-Sahelian architecture and one of the largest mud brick structures in the world, located in present-day Mali.
Songhai:Songhai was a powerful kingdom in West Africa that succeeded Mali in the 15th century. Its most prominent feature was its military prowess, which enabled it to conquer neighboring kingdoms and expand its territory to become the largest empire in West Africa. Songhai's armies were well-organized and well-equipped, with thousands of soldiers and a fleet of war canoes on the Niger River.
One historically significant event in Songhai's history was the reign of Askia Muhammad, who came to power in the late 15th century. Muhammad was a devout Muslim who established Islam as the official religion of the empire and promoted scholarship and learning. Under his rule, Timbuktu became an even more important center of Islamic scholarship and attracted scholars from across the Muslim world.
Artifact/Image: The Tomb of Askia, a large pyramid-shaped structure located in Gao, Mali, which was the capital of the Songhai Empire. The tomb was built to honor Askia Muhammad and his achievements.
Read more about Mali kingdom here:
https://brainly.com/question/31182278
#SPJ1
Which parts of the chart represent an action taken by the U.S. House of Representatives?
A, C, E, G, H, J, K
B, D, F, I, J, L
G, J, M
I, K, L
Answer:
the answer is A (the first one)
Explanation:
Answer:
A
Explanation:
I just know
escribe una anecdota divertida que te alla pasado
Una vez, estaba en una reunión con mis amigos en una casa. Decidimos jugar un juego de mesa y, después de unas horas, nos dimos cuenta de que alguien había desaparecido. Buscamos por todas partes y finalmente encontramos a nuestro amigo dormido debajo de la mesa, con la cabeza sobre el tablero del juego. Resulta que estaba tan concentrado en el juego que se quedó dormido allí mismo. Todos nos reímos al verlo y ahora siempre lo recordamos como uno de los momentos más divertidos de nuestras reuniones.
NEED HELP ASAP - Nativism
1. Definition: Your definition of nativism in your own words.
2. Characteristics: Key ideas or features that makes up nativism.
3. Examples/Models: Examples of nativism from around the world.
4. Non-Examples: Examples from around the world of what nativism is not.
Answer:
1.Nativism is a political and social ideology that emphasizes the interests and rights of native-born inhabitants over those of immigrants.
2.
The key ideas that make up nativism include:
Cultural superiority: Nativists believe that their own culture is superior to that of other cultures and that immigrants pose a threat to their way of life.
Economic protectionism: Nativists often advocate for policies that protect native-born workers and businesses, such as tariffs and immigration restrictions.
Xenophobia: Nativists are often fearful or hostile towards immigrants, particularly those from cultures that are perceived as different or threatening.
Nationalism: Nativism is often associated with a strong sense of national identity and a desire to protect that identity from outside influences.
Anti-immigration sentiment: Nativists generally support restrictive immigration policies, including stricter border controls, deportation of undocumented immigrants, and limits on legal immigration.
3.
Nativism has been a part of American political and social discourse since the colonial era. Some historical examples of nativism in the United States include:
The Know-Nothing Party: This was a political party that emerged in the 1850s and was primarily focused on limiting the political power and influence of immigrants, particularly Catholics.
The Chinese Exclusion Act: This federal law, passed in 1882, prohibited Chinese immigrants from coming to the United States and was the first significant federal law restricting immigration.
The Immigration Act of 1924: This law established quotas on the number of immigrants who could enter the United States from various countries and favored immigrants from Western and Northern Europe over those from Southern and Eastern Europe.
The Red Scare: This was a period of intense anti-communist hysteria in the United States during the 1940s and 1950s that led to the persecution of many immigrants, particularly those from Eastern Europe and Asia.
The modern anti-immigrant movement: In recent years, nativist sentiment has been fueled by concerns about illegal immigration, particularly from Latin America and the Middle East, and has led to the rise of groups like the Minutemen and the Tea Party.
4. Some examples of things that are not considered nativism include:
A preference for one's own cultural traditions: While many nativists do believe in the superiority of their own culture, simply valuing one's own cultural traditions is not the same as nativism.
Support for border security or immigration enforcement: While nativists often advocate for stricter border controls and tougher immigration policies, not all supporters of these measures are motivated by nativist sentiment.
Concerns about national security: While fears of terrorism or other threats to national security can sometimes overlap with nativist sentiment, not all such concerns are rooted in a desire to protect native-born inhabitants at the expense of immigrants.
Advocacy for assimilation or integration: While some nativists may call for immigrants to assimilate or integrate into American society, this is not inherently a nativist idea and can be motivated by a desire for social cohesion or cultural harmony.
Criticism of specific immigration policies: While some critics of specific immigration policies may be labeled as nativists, it is important to evaluate their arguments on their own merits rather than assuming that all criticism of immigration is motivated by nativist sentiment.
Please help quick I’ll mark brainly
The sudden halt to the Chinese treasure voyages to the Indian Ocean left a door open for the Portuguese to dominate trading there a century later. Once the Portuguese established their dominance in the Indian Ocean, they traveled farther east and established port cities along the Chinese coastline. Later, the Portuguese influence was replaced by the British and Dutch whose imperialism led to the claiming of previously independent Asian nations as colonies of England and the Netherlands. Do you think this timeline of events would have continued had the Chinese remained present and dominant in the Indian Ocean?
If the Chinese had maintained their dominance in Indian Ocean, it is possible that they could have established trade relationships and port cities along the East African coast and in the Arabian Peninsula.
What is trade?Trade refers to exchange of goods, the services, or resources between individuals, businesses, or the nations. The purpose of trade is to fulfill the needs and wants of the parties involved and achieve mutual benefit. Trade can take place locally, nationally, or internationally, and can involve physical or digital goods and services. Trade can be conducted through various means, including bartering, buying and selling, or exchanging resources. Trade has played a significant role in human history, driving economic growth, cultural exchange, and technological advancements. It has also been a source of conflict and competition, leading to trade wars and protectionist policies. Today, international trade is governed by various regulations and agreements, such as the World Trade Organization, to ensure fair and equitable trade practices and promote economic development.
To learn more about trade, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/17175941
#SPJ1
Who became the first Congress leader in the 1900's?
what emerged as the core concerns of the webster-hayne debate? multiple select question. nullification settlement of the west states' rights
The core concerns of the Webster-Hayne debate were states' rights and nullification. So the answer is states' rights and nullification.
The core concerns of the Webster-Hayne debate as follows :
States' Rights: This was a central issue in the debate, with Hayne arguing that states had the right to nullify federal laws they deemed unconstitutional, while Webster argued that the federal government had ultimate authority and that the Constitution was a compact between the states and the federal government.
Nullification: Hayne argued that nullification was a legitimate means for states to resist federal authority, while Webster argued that nullification was unconstitutional and would lead to the dissolution of the Union.
Therefore, the correct answer is: States' Rights and Nullification. Settlement of the West was not a core concern of the Webster-Hayne debate.
For more questions on: nullification
https://brainly.com/question/887694
#SPJ11
colonization was extremely expensive. one of the major means the english used to offset the costs of this, most notably in the case of jamestown, was the use of:
The English used a variety of methods to offset the costs of colonization, most notably in the case of Jamestown.
One of these methods was the establishment of the Virginia Company of London, which was a joint-stock company that raised funds from investors to finance the settlement of Jamestown. The Virginia Company also provided incentives to settlers, such as land grants, to encourage immigration and settlement.
Additionally, the English government provided financial assistance and subsidies to the colony, and merchants and traders were able to make a profit by trading with the natives and selling goods to the colonists. Finally, the colonists were able to generate revenue through the cultivation of the land, the production of goods, and the sale of goods to England. Overall, the English used a combination of methods to offset the costs of colonization in Jamestown.
To know more about colonization, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30900919
#SPJ4
Based on the evidence, do you think it's likely that Nixon was also involved in the planning or ordering the break-in? Explain
3 - The Constitution gives Congress the power to impeach and try a president for "Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors." Do you think the evidence would have warranted an impeachment and conviction for Nixon? Explain.
4 - In a 1977 interview with British journalist David Frost, Nixon made the argument that a president is allowed to commit illegal acts if they are done to promote the good of the country. Do you agree that a president should be allowed to break the law for the good of the country? Explain
Answer:
Based on the evidence, do you think it's likely that Nixon was also involved in the planning or ordering the break-in? Explain There is strong evidence that suggests Nixon was involved in the cover-up of the break-in, but it is still unclear whether he was directly involved in the planning or ordering of it. Further investigation and evidence may be needed to make a definitive conclusion. 3 - The Constitution gives Congress the power to impeach and try a president for "Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors." Do you think the evidence would have warranted an impeachment and conviction for Nixon? Explain. The evidence against Nixon, including the Watergate scandal and obstruction of justice, was significant and could have warranted an impeachment and conviction. However, without further investigation and a fair trial, it is impossible to make a definitive conclusion.
4 - In a 1977 interview with British journalist David Frost, Nixon made the argument that a president is allowed to commit illegal acts if they are done to promote the good of the country. Do you agree that a president should be allowed to break the law for the good of the country? Explain This argument raises important ethical and legal questions about the balance between national security and individual rights. It is crucial to carefully consider the potential consequences of allowing a president to break the law in certain circumstances before coming to a conclusion.
Explanation:
Based on the evidence, Nixon may or may not be involved in the planning or ordering the break -in.
Although there is compelling evidence that Nixon was engaged in the cover-up of the break-in, it is still unknown if he was personally responsible for its conception or execution.
To get a firm judgement, further research and proof may be required.
3. Do you think the evidence would have warranted an impeachment and conviction for Nixon?
The Watergate affair and other relevant charges against Nixon may have supported an impeachment and conviction. Yet it is hard to draw a firm judgement without more research and a fair trial.4. Do you agree that a president should be allowed to break the law for the good of the country?
The balance between individual rights and national security is a significant ethical and legal issue that is brought up by this debate.
When making a decision, it is essential to carefully weigh the possible repercussions of permitting a president to breach the law in specific situations.
To know more about Constitution visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29799909
#SPJ1
Which nation was told it
could not make treaties
with other nations
following the passage of
the Platt Amendment?
A. Cuba
B. Haiti
C. Philippines
D. Guam
A. Cuba
Explanation: Platt Amendment was a treaty between the U.S. and Cuba that attempted to protect Cuba's independence from foreign intervention.
View Full Description
The lesson states that in 1832 in the case of Worcester v. Georgia, the Supreme Court ruled that the Cherokee had absolute rights over their tribal land and that no federal or state government had legal rights there, however; President Jackson refused to uphold Chief Justice John Marshall's ruling. Because the Supreme Court does not have any authority to enforce the rulings they pass it is possible for them to be disregarded, as was done by Andrew Jackson. Should the Supreme Court have any additional powers to allow them to enforce their rulings? If so, why, and what should the power be? If not, why not?
Your response should be 3-5 sentences long and show that you’ve thought about the topic/question at hand. Please be aware we are looking for YOUR PERSONAL OPINION and there is not a single “correct answer.”
Answer:
Worcester v. Georgia, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on March 3, 1832, held (5–1) that the states did not have the right to impose regulations on Native American land. Although Pres. Andrew Jackson refused to enforce the ruling, the decision helped form the basis for most subsequent law in the United States regarding Native Americans.
About how many Americans were returned due to the treaty of Ghent
Answer:
The Treaty of Ghent, signed on December 24, 1814, ended the War of 1812 between the United States and Great Britain. The treaty did not require any Americans to be returned.
Explanation:
all of the following were arguments made against the davis administration by its opponents except: a) the davis administration was corrupt b) the davis administration's policies led to excessive taxation c) the davis administration used the state police and state militia to ensure dictatorial rule over texas d) the davis administration cared little for the civil rights of the freed slaves
Answer:
The argument that was NOT made against the Davis administration by its opponents is:
a) The Davis administration was corrupt.
The argument that was not made against the Davis Administration by its opponents is that d) "the Davis administration cared little for the civil rights of the freed slaves".
The Davis Administration was established in Texas at the conclusion of the Civil War. Union troops were occupying Texas, and the Davis administration was tasked with governing a state that was attempting to heal from the wounds of conflict.
There were various opposition groups and individuals who rose up against the Davis administration, making the following accusations and allegations about its administration:
a) The Davis Administration was corrupt: Accusations of corruption were widespread throughout the administration.
b) The Davis administration's policies led to excessive taxation: The policies implemented by the Davis Administration were accused of being the cause of excessive taxation.
c) The Davis Administration used the state police and state militia to ensure dictatorial rule over Texas: One of the Davis administration's primary faults was seen as its usage of the state police and state militia to maintain dictatorial rule over Texas.
d) The Davis administration cared little for the civil rights of the freed slaves: This is not an argument made against the Davis administration by its opponents. The correct answer is d) the Davis administration cared little for the civil rights of the freed slaves.
You can learn more about Davis administration at
https://brainly.com/question/5239695
#SPJ11
Which response best completes the graphic organizer to show reasons for
U.S. imperialism?
Reasons for U.S. Imperialism
?
One reason that show US imperialism is Establishing strategic military positions.
Other reasons - Seeking to expand global markets Promoting political and economic stabilityPursuing a civilizing missionUS expansionism -After the Civil War (1861-1865), America entered a period of reconstruction known as Reconstruction (1865-1877). After the Restoration, the United States entered the Gilded Age (1877-1900), during which the US economy experienced tremendous growth. As a result of this growth, the United States began looking to foreign markets to sell its products. In addition to exploring new markets, American imperialism was motivated by Social Darwinism, Manifest Destiny, and the Cold War.
To know more about US Imperialism -
https://brainly.com/question/715589
#SPJ1
What laws came into effect because of such writings as The Cry of the Children ?
Answer:
These laws gradually shortened work hours, improved working conditions, and raised the age at which children could work. Eventually, the U.S. passed the Fair Labor Standards Act in 1938, which set the minimum working age to 16 during school hours, 14 for certain after-school jobs, and 18 for more dangerous jobs.
3. Briefly describe the crisis of Social Security today.
The crisis of Social Security today refers to the financial challenges faced by the Social Security system in the United States. The Social Security program, which provides retirement, disability, and survivor benefits to millions of Americans, is facing a funding shortfall due to a combination of factors such as demographic changes, longer life expectancy, declining birth rates, and increasing healthcare costs. The number of retirees has been increasing, while the number of workers paying into the system has been decreasing. This has put a strain on the Social Security Trust Fund, which is projected to be depleted by 2033, unless action is taken to address the issue. If this happens, benefits may have to be reduced by as much as 25% or taxes increased to maintain the program's solvency. The crisis of Social Security today is a complex issue that requires a comprehensive solution to ensure the financial stability of the program for future generations.
You said to open it briefly, but it was such an explanation, sorry
Assignment: 05.03 Ancient Rome - Beginnings of Roman Culture Advanced Honors
Comparing either the lower class or upper class of life in ancient Greece and Rome is required for the task. The comparison must cover how social rank, gender, and age affected living in both civilizations and is at least two paragraphs long.
How does Rome differ from Greece?Greece and Rome are both Mediterranean countries that are close enough to each other's latitudes to allow for the cultivation of wine and olives. These terrains, however, were very dissimilar. The ancient Greek city-states were geographically isolated from one another and all located close to the sea.
What key differences do you see between Greek and Roman educational systems?Greek education involved the careful study of mathematics and science, whereas Roman education did not. This is the main distinction between Greek and Roman education.
To know more about ancient Greece visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/11428893
#SPJ1
how did fritz harkort influence the nature of economic development in nineteenth-century germany?
Answer:Industrialization in Germany was the phase of the breakthrough of industrialization in Germany, beginning at the time from around 1815 to 1835.
Fritz Harkort significantly influenced the nature of economic development in nineteenth-century Germany through his pioneering work in the industrial sector.
Here's a step-by-step explanation of his contributions:
1. Early career: Harkort was a successful businessman who began his career as a merchant, gaining experience in trade and manufacturing.
2. Embracing technology: Harkort was an early advocate for the use of technology in industry. He recognized the potential of steam power and machine manufacturing, which led him to invest in and promote these technologies in Germany.
3. Founding Harkort'sche Maschinenbau-Anstalt: In 1819, Harkort founded Harkort'sche Maschinenbau-Anstalt, a pioneering engineering firm that specialized in the production of steam engines and other machinery. This was one of the first companies of its kind in Germany and played a crucial role in the country's industrialization.
4. Railway industry: Harkort's company was also involved in the development of the railway industry in Germany, further supporting economic growth and the expansion of trade networks.
5. Political influence: In addition to his business endeavors, Harkort was an influential politician who advocated for economic policies that supported industrialization and economic development. He served as a member of the Prussian National Assembly and the Erfurt Parliament, promoting progressive economic policies.
6. Legacy: Fritz Harkort's contributions to the industrialization of Germany during the nineteenth century laid the groundwork for the country's economic growth and modernization. His emphasis on technological innovation and investment in industry was crucial to Germany's transformation into an economic powerhouse.
In summary, Fritz Harkort's influence on economic development in nineteenth-century Germany was through his support of technological innovation, investment in industry, and political advocacy for progressive economic policies. His work helped to establish Germany as a leading industrial nation during this time.\
For more about economic development:
https://brainly.com/question/16299816
#SPJ11
the declaration of independence did all of the following except d. offered the british one last chance at reconciliation one purpose of the declaration of independence was to d. explain to the rest of the world why the colonies had revolted the first continental congress was called in order to a. consider ways of redressing colonial grievances as a result of the seven years' war, great britain b. became the dominant power in north america while slavery might have begun in america for economic reasons, c. racial discrimination also powerfully molded the american slave system the great compromise at the constitutional convention worked out an acceptable scheme for c. apportioning congressional representation probably the most alarming characteristic of the new constitution to those who opposed it was the c. absence of a bill of rights
Answer:george wshinton
Explanation:
because george washinton
The Declaration of Independence did all of the following except (D.) offer the British one last chance at reconciliation. One purpose of the Declaration of Independence was to explain to the rest of the world why the colonies had revolted. The First Continental Congress was called in order to consider ways of redressing colonial grievances.
As a result of the Seven Years' War, Great Britain became the dominant power in North America. While slavery might have begun in America for economic reasons, racial discrimination also powerfully molded the American slave system. The Great Compromise at the Constitutional Convention worked out an acceptable scheme for apportioning congressional representation. Probably the most alarming characteristic of the new Constitution to those who opposed it was the absence of a Bill of Rights.
To know more about Declaration of Independence refer here :
https://brainly.com/question/14578050#
#SPJ11
40. In Ms. Morales’s class, the ratio of boys to girls is 3:7. The class sizes at Ms. Morales’s school range from 22 to 34 students per class. What is the total number of students in Ms. Morales’s class? A. 21 students B. 24 students C. 28 students D. 30 students
Answer: answer D 30 students
Explanation:
i brainly'd it :)
briefly explain one major difference between williams's and gaddis's interpretations of the origins of the cold war.
One major difference between Williams's and Gaddis's interpretations of the origins of the Cold War is their view on the responsibility for the conflict.
Williams argues that the United States was primarily responsible for the onset of the Cold War due to its expansionist economic policies, such as the Marshall Plan and the Truman Doctrine, which threatened the Soviet Union's security and interests. He also emphasizes the role of ideology in shaping US foreign policy, particularly the belief in American exceptionalism and the need to spread capitalism and democracy globally.
Learn more about Gaddis's interpretations
https://brainly.com/question/23965186
#SPJ4
How does the WPA promote public confidence and economic security
The Works Progress Administration (WPA) was a federal program established during the Great Depression in the United States to provide jobs for unemployed Americans. By hiring millions of workers to carry out public works projects, such as constructing roads, bridges, schools, and public buildings, the WPA not only helped to stimulate economic growth and reduce unemployment but also promoted public confidence in the government's ability to address the economic crisis. In addition, the WPA's investment in infrastructure and public works projects provided long-term economic benefits, such as improved transportation and communication networks, that helped to strengthen the country's economic security. Overall, the WPA played a significant role in mitigating the effects of the Great Depression and restoring public confidence and economic stability in the United States.
The WPA, or Works Progress Administration, promoted public confidence and economic security in several ways. First, by providing jobs to millions of unemployed Americans during the Great Depression, the WPA helped to alleviate the economic hardships faced by families and communities. This not only provided immediate relief but also contributed to long-term economic stability by creating a sense of financial security and stimulating consumer spending. Second, the WPA's projects, which included the construction of roads, bridges, and public buildings, improved the nation's infrastructure and increased public access to essential services. This contributed to a sense of national progress and achievement, further boosting public confidence. Finally, the WPA's emphasis on cultural programs, such as the Federal Theatre Project and the Federal Art Project, provided employment for artists and performers and helped to enrich American culture during a difficult period in the nation's history, further bolstering public morale and pride.
What is federalism?
Federalism is a system in which only the federal government can collect taxes from the citizens of a state.
Federalism is a system in which state governments reserve some political power for the federal government.
Federalism is a system in which all political power rests with the three branches of the federal government.
Federalism is a system in which political power is shared between the federal government and state governments.
In a federalist system, the federal government and state governments share political power.
What, in a nutshell, is federalism?Federalism is a form of government in which a central authority and numerous national constituent parts share power. There are at least two tiers of governance in a federation. All of these governmental tiers have a certain degree of independence from one another.
What do you mean by federalism?Federalism is a form of government in which a central authority and numerous national constituent parts share power. A federation often has two levels of governance. One is the national government, which oversees a few issues of general importance to the entire nation.
To know more about governments visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/16940043
#SPJ1
What made the south colonies different from New England and the middle colonies?
Answer:New England had skilled craftsmen in the industry of shipbuilding.
Explanation:
In contrast to the South where the cash crop plantation system dominated, and New England whose rocky soil made large-scale agriculture difficult, The middle colonies were fertile. Land was generally acquired more easily than in New England or in the plantation South.