The young man wished to express his opinion over the ongoing research.
to voice his worry about how the study will affect his neighborhood. He believed that the researchers' approaches were insulting to Native American customs and beliefs and that they were collecting knowledge from the community without giving anything in return.
Additionally, he emphasized his dissatisfaction with the underrepresentation of Native American perspectives in academic research as well as his wish for increased cooperation and respect between researchers and Indigenous people.
Learn more about The young man
https://brainly.com/question/10237465
#SPJ4
Review paragraph 22 which begins I grew up speaking Spanish the author of the sizes his grandfathers physical abilities but he also discusses his mental abilities a celebration of grandfathers
The author praises his grandfather's cognitive as well as physical prowess in paragraph 22.
Author mentions that he learned to speak Spanish as a child, indicating that his grandfather was able to pass on his linguistic expertise to the following generation. Also, he mentions how his grandfather was a voracious reader and a good storyteller, demonstrating his smart mind. The author concludes the paragraph by praising the power and brilliance of his grandfather, implying that he served as an inspiration to the author and a source of pride. The author is thinking about the physical and mental attributes of his grandfather. His grandfather's ability to maintain his physical dexterity and strength into old age is something that the boy admires.
The complete Question is:
Review paragraph 22, which begins, "I grew up speaking Spanish..." The author emphasizes his grandfather's physical abilities, but he also discusses his mental abilities. What is the main idea of this paragraph, and how do the details support it? Highlight textual evidence and make annotations to explain your choices.
To know more about Author refer to the link below :
https://brainly.com/question/9260046
#SPJ1
Snowbound 3 Based on this episode, the reader can tell that
3 Snowbound Based on it here, the Carlin Hunting Party episode's mystery. The plot in this novel is based on a real hunting expedition that traveled to the Idaho highlands in 1893.
Because when hired chef fell ill, his friends abandoned him to die in order to protect themselves.
Naturally, not right immediately, but it eventually does due to the leadership of the group's selfishness and carelessness in a painful and inevitable way. Ultimately, I couldn't really hold the survivors responsible for that choice,
but there were so many things they might well have accomplished to avoid the calamity that everyone bears some responsibility, even the cook.
To know more about the novel click here
brainly.com/question/1831884
#SPJ4
To ensure clear communication, use precise words to convey your ideas.
a. Trueb. False
The statement "To ensure clear and effective communication, use precise words to convey your ideas" is true.
Explanation: When communicating with others, it is essential to use precise language to ensure that our meaning is conveyed correctly. Precise words and phrases are exact and accurate, leaving no room for ambiguity or misinterpretation. In contrast, vague language can cause confusion and misunderstandings.
The use of precise words promotes clear communication, which is essential for conveying one's thoughts and ideas to others. By being precise, the speaker can get their point across with accuracy and ease, and the listener can understand their intended meaning accurately. Therefore, it is always essential to use precise words to convey our ideas.
Learn more about effective communication here:https://brainly.com/question/26152499
#SPJ11
what is the purpose of ariel's speech after the banquet vanishes?what contribution does the speech make to the plot, or sequence of evetnts
The purpose of Ariel's speech after the banquet vanishes is to remind the audience of the Duke's wrongdoing. The speech's contribution to the plot is that it acts as a turning point in the story.
Ariel was supposed to report the success of the banquet, but she did not, and instead gave a long speech, reminding the audience of what was happening. She reminds the audience of the harm caused by the Duke's activities. The plot changes as a result of the speech. Ariel's speech acts as a turning point in the plot of "The Tempest".
The plot of "The Tempest" revolves around Prospero's revenge against his enemies. Ariel's speech serves as a reminder that Prospero's revenge is unnecessary, and he no longer requires it. Prospero forgives his enemies and frees Ariel, and the other characters are allowed to go home.
In conclusion, Ariel's speech plays a significant role in the plot of "The Tempest", acting as a turning point that leads to the play's resolution.
Learn more about plot https://brainly.com/question/1930057
#SPJ11
Independent Practice
.
Extended Response Sam talks to both the servant and General
Haldimand about the ashes on Sherburn's Hill. How are Sam's
interactions with the servant and his interactions with General
Haldimand similar? How are they different? Use details from the story
The "you do" part of a course that has been expressly taught is also referred to as independent practise. Students have the chance to practise the topics or skills from the lesson through independent practise.
What is an example of independent practise?Before an assessment is offered, students can strive towards mastery of the knowledge and abilities taught in the lesson during Individual Practice, which is the phase of the lesson cycle where they are given the chance to practise the concept introduced during the Introduction to New Learning.
What distinguishes guided practise from independent practise?Teaching, modelling, and offering feedback are all part of the guided practise. Following concept learning and when students are prepared to work independently, independent practise can be used.
To know more about independent practise visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/26035095
#SPJ1
How are ""floaters"" and ""tube riders"" different from moves like the ""rodeo clown"" or ""Superman""?
Abrupt changes in depth, such as these induced by underwater reefs or sandbars, give upward jostle to steep plunging waves. They're the form of waves a surfer needs to launch aerial maneuvers.
What is a floater in surfing?When a surfer rides over and alongside the pinnacle of the broken section of a wave. This maneuver is named a “floater” because surfers get a “weightless sensation” as they slide over both a pitching lip or whitewater.
Floater works Tuesday via Saturday and is responsible for filling in for body of workers when there is a brief vacancy. Floater will keep the capability to perform responsibilities in Customer Service, Onboard Passenger Services, and in Operations Monitoring Center.
Learn more about ""floaters"" and ""tube riders" here:
https://brainly.com/question/6364757#SPJ1HELLP EMERGENCY ITS ABT INFINITIVES
Answer:
B: Grandma Daisy taught her grandchildren to knit sweaters for themselves before winter.
Explanation:
In this sentence, the infinitive phrase "to knit sweaters for themselves" functions as an adverb modifying the verb "taught." It indicates the purpose or intention of the action, which is to teach the grandchildren how to knit sweaters for themselves.
the second paragraph of an expanded pyramid story is also called . a. the trail b. the jump c. the bridge d. the cliff
The second paragraph of an expanded pyramid story is also called the "jump".
What is a pyramid story?A pyramid story is a style of writing that follows a structure similar to that of a pyramid. It is a writing strategy that involves dividing a story into specific sections or paragraphs, each of which serves a specific purpose in moving the narrative forward.
There are a few different variations of the pyramid story format, but generally, it consists of an introduction or lead, followed by several paragraphs that provide additional information and details about the topic or event. The paragraphs gradually become shorter and more focused as the story progresses.
Learn more about pyramid story here:https://brainly.com/question/14888971
#SPJ11
90 POINTS!!
Add commentary in the empty spaces \
In Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare, Friar Laurence is to blame for most of the deaths because he influenced the foolish actions of Romeo and Juliet. When Friar Laurence was held by Prince after Romeo and Juliet’s deaths. Friar Laurence takes responsibility for Romeo and Juliet’s death when he says, “And here I stand both to impeach and purge, Myself condemned and myself excused” (Shakespeare 5.3.226-227). By admitting his fault, he acknowledges that his actions, though well-intentioned, ultimately led to the couple's demise. This shows that he was not thinking about his decisions thoroughly before making them. An Example of this is when he quickly planned for Juliet to give her a potion to fake her death. This plan by Friar Laurence ironically led to Juliet’s death in the long run: “And, if thou dearest I’ll give the remedy.” (Shakespeare 4.1.76). (commentary)
Friar Laurence wanted to use Romeo and Juliet to stop the feud, which ultimately led to their deaths: “To turn your household rancor to pure love.” (Shakespeare 2.3.92).
(commentary)
It is true that Friar Laurence played a significant role in the tragic outcome of Romeo and Juliet's story. While his intentions were good, his actions were hasty and ill-advised.
How to explain the storyBy agreeing to marry Romeo and Juliet in secret, he set in motion a chain of events that ultimately led to the young couple's deaths. Additionally, his decision to give Juliet a potion to fake her death was reckless, as it was based on the assumption that everything would go according to plan.
However, it is also worth noting that Friar Laurence was not the only one responsible for the tragedy. The feud between the Capulets and Montagues, the parents' pressure on their children to marry within their own social class, and Romeo and Juliet's impulsive decisions also contributed to the disastrous outcome. Friar Laurence was not acting in a vacuum, but rather in a complex web of social, familial, and cultural pressures.
Overall, while Friar Laurence bears some responsibility for the tragedy, it is important to recognize that there were multiple factors at play. Shakespeare's portrayal of the story is a reminder of the dangers of impulsive decisions and the devastating consequences they can have.
Learn more about Shakespeare on
https://brainly.com/question/7592021
#SPJ1
In Chunk 4, in what two ways does Krimsky say the media must be independent? How does he suggest that these goals be achieved?
this is not a multiple-choice.
Here's chunk 4
Chunk 4
18Where is the relevance of all this to the emerging democracies around the world? Certainly the American experience, for all its messiness, provides a useful precedent, if not always a model.
19For example, when one talks about an independent media, it is necessary to include financial independence as a prerequisite, in addition to political independence. The American revenue-earning model of heavy reliance on advertising is highly suspect in many former communist countries, but one has to weigh the alternatives. Are government and party subsidies less imprisoning? If journalists are so fearful of contamination by advertiser pressure, they can build internal walls between news and business functions, similar to those American newspapers erected earlier in this century.
20If they are fearful of political contamination of the information-gathering process, they can build another wall separating the newsroom from the editorial department—another important concept in modern American journalism.
21The problem in many new democracies is that journalists who once had to toe the single-party line equate independence with opposition. Because they speak out against the government, they say they are independent. But haven’t they just traded one affiliation for another? There is little room for unvarnished truth in a partisan press.
22Is objectivity a luxury in societies that have only recently begun to enjoy the freedom to voice their opinions? Listen to a Lithuanian newspaper editor shortly after his country gained its independence: "I want my readers to know what their heads are for. " His readers were used to being told not only what to think about, but what to think. Democracy requires the public to make choices and decisions. This editor wanted to prepare citizens for that responsibility with articles that inform but do not pass judgment. His circulation increased.
23Though nearly 60 percent of the world’s nations today are declared democracies—a monumental change from a mere decade ago—most of them have nevertheless instituted press laws that prohibit reporting on a whole array of subjects ranging from the internal activity and operations of government to the private lives of leaders. Some of these are well-intentioned efforts to "preserve public stability. " But all of them, ALL of them, undermine self-governance.
24The watchdog role of the free press can often appear as mean-spirited. How do the government and public protect themselves from its excesses? In the United States, it is done in a variety of ways. One, for example, is the use of "ombudsmen. " In this case, news organizations employ an in-house critic to hear public complaints and either publish or broadcast their judgments. Another is the creation of citizens’ councils which sit to hear public complaints about the press and then issue verdicts, which, although not carrying the force of law, are aired widely.
25Last, and most effective, is libel law. In the United States, a citizen can win a substantial monetary award from a news organization if libel is proven in a court of law. It is much harder for a public official or celebrity than an ordinary citizen to win a libel case against the press, because the courts have ruled that notoriety comes with being in the limelight. In most cases, the complaining ``notable `` must prove "malice aforethought.
26There is nothing in the American constitution that says the press must be responsible and accountable. Those requirements were reserved for the government. In a free-market democracy, the people—that is the voters and the buying public—ultimately decide as to how their press should act. If at least a semblance of truth-in-the-public-service does not remain a motivating force for the mass media of the future, neither free journalism nor true democracy has much hope, in my opinion.
27The nature and use of new technology is not the essential problem. If true journalists are worried about their future in an age when everyone with a computer can call themselves journalists, then the profession has to demonstrate that it is special, that it offers something of real value and can prove it to the public. There is still a need today—perhaps more than ever—for identifying sense amidst the nonsense, for sifting the important from the trivial, and, yes, for telling the truth. Those[‘d goals still constitute the best mandate for a free press in a democracy.
28George Washington’s admonition, uttered at the Constitutional Convention, still stands: "Let us raise a standard to which the wise and honest can repair. "
In Chunk 4, Krimsky argues that for a media to be independent, it must possess financial and political independence. He suggests that to achieve financial independence.
Media outlets can adopt the American revenue-earning model of heavy reliance on advertising or government and party subsidies. However, he cautions that the latter can be imprisoning. To achieve political and financial independence, Krimsky suggests the separation of the newsroom and editorial departments and building internal walls between news and business functions. He also proposes using ombudsmen, citizens' councils, and libel law to protect against the excesses of the free press.
Ultimately, Krimsky argues that the media must prioritize a semblance of truth-in-the-public-service as the best mandate for a free press in a democracy.
To learn more about financial independence, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/30322334
#SPJ4
Did you start with: "Now tell me why you were so upset when you saw the piano. "?
My thoughts and feelings at the time were mostly of sadness. Seeing the piano reminded me of all the times I had spent playing the piano with my mother when I was younger.
I felt a wave of nostalgia and sadness wash over me because I knew I would never experience those moments with her again. I realized that I would have to accept the fact that she was gone and I would never be able to have those moments back again. It was a bittersweet feeling that filled me with both sadness and appreciation for the memories I had created with her.
To learn more about Piano link is here
brainly.com/question/1281704
#SPJ4
The complete question is:
"Now tell me why you were so upset when you saw the piano, what were your thoughts and feelings at the time?"
The houses were of wood, with the second story projecting over the first, and the third sticking its elbows out beyond the second. They were skeletons of strong criss-cross beams, with solid material between, coated with plaster.
What is the best explanation of the purpose of the figurative language in this passage?
It helps to develop the plot.
It helps to develop the protagonist.
It helps to develop the setting.
It helps to develop the theme.
Answer: C. It helps to develop the setting.
Explanation: The figurative language used in the passage describes the houses as "skeletons of strong criss-cross beams" with the second and third stories projecting out beyond the first and second, respectively. This vivid description provides details about the physical characteristics of the houses and creates a clear mental image for the reader. By emphasizing the architectural features of the houses, the figurative language helps to develop the setting of the story.
The setting refers to the time, place, and overall environment in which the events of a story take place. In this case, the figurative language describes the physical appearance and construction of the houses, giving the reader a sense of the architectural style and materials used in the setting. This description helps to create a specific atmosphere or ambiance, which can impact the overall mood of the story and provide important context for the events that unfold.
Learn more about figurative language here: https://brainly.com/question/9893858.
Read the following excerpt about Cleopatra, a queen of Egypt. Then, answer the question that follows.
Her voice has been compared to an instrument of many strings, so melodious was it; and she spoke readily to every ambassador in his own language and was said to have been the only sovereign of Egypt who understood and spoke the languages of all her subjects, which included the Greek, Egyptian, Ethiopic, Troglodytic, Hebrew, Arabic, and Syriac.
Based on the information in the passage, why might Cleopatra be described as a "polyglot?"
a
She enjoyed singing
b
She played an instrument
c
She spoke many languages
d
She was an ambassador
We can see here based on the information in the passage, Cleopatra might be described as a "polyglot" because: C. She spoke many languages.
What is polyglot?A polyglot is a person who knows and speaks multiple languages fluently. The term "polyglot" comes from the Greek words "poly," meaning "many," and "glotta," meaning "tongue" or "language."
Polyglots are often able to switch between languages with ease, and may be able to speak, read, and write in multiple languages. They may have learned these languages through various means, such as formal education, immersion in a language-speaking environment, or self-study.
Thus, Cleopatra might be described as a "polyglot" because she understood and spoke the languages of all her subjects, which included the Greek, Egyptian, Ethiopic, Troglodytic, Hebrew, Arabic, and Syriac.
Learn more about polyglot on https://brainly.com/question/13706487
#SPJ1
Answer:
c
Explanation:
I took the test
lassify each of the following statements as positive or normative. statement positive normative the government can increase labor productivity by improving public education. the government should provide basic healthcare to all citizens. the government should provide subsidies to domestic export industries. the federal reserve should take action to lower the inflation rate. society faces a short-run trade-off between inflation and unemployment
Statements 1 and 5 are positive, while statements 2, 3, and 4 are normative.
Remember, positive statements focus on facts and cause-and-effect relationships that can be tested, while normative statements involve opinions or value judgments about what should or ought to be done.
In order to classify the given statements as positive or normative, let's first understand the difference between them. Positive statements are objective and fact-based, whereas normative statements are subjective and opinion-based.
1. The government can increase labor productivity by improving public education.
This statement is positive, as it asserts a cause-and-effect relationship between public education and labor productivity, which can be tested or verified through empirical evidence.
2. The government should provide basic healthcare to all citizens.
This statement is normative, as it presents an opinion or value judgment about what the government should do in terms of healthcare provision.
3. The government should provide subsidies to domestic export industries.
This statement is normative, as it offers an opinion or value judgment about what the government should do to support specific industries.
4. The Federal Reserve should take action to lower the inflation rate.
This statement is normative, as it suggests an opinion or value judgment about the actions the Federal Reserve should take to address inflation.
5. Society faces a short-run trade-off between inflation and unemployment.
This statement is positive, as it describes an economic concept, the short-run trade-off between inflation and unemployment, which can be analyzed and tested using empirical data.
know more about empirical evidence here
https://brainly.com/question/15880833#
#SPJ11
Two of Georgia's most important industries are the agricultural industry and the film industry. Write an argument stating which of the two industries you think will be the most important one for modern Georgia.
The agricultural industry in Georgia provides more than $75 billion in annual income and employs over 380,000 people. Georgia is among the top five states in the country for agricultural production, with the primary crops being peaches, peanuts, poultry, and cotton. On the other hand, the film industry in Georgia has experienced explosive growth in recent years, thanks to the state's attractive tax incentives and diverse filming locations. Georgia has become one of the top destinations for film productions globally, with productions such as Black Panther, The Walking Dead, and Stranger Things being filmed in the state. According to the Motion Picture Association of America, the film and television industry supports over 28,000 jobs and contributes more than $9.5 billion to Georgia's economy. Therefore, both industries are essential to Georgia's economy and provide numerous job opportunities to its residents. However, whether one is more important than the other depends on several factors, including the economic impact on the state, the number of jobs provided, and the market stability. However in my opinion the agricultural industry is more important due to the food it produces.
consider the poetic and literary devices used throughout the play. do you think the form of shakespeare's works strengthens and reinforces the content? or not?
Yes, Shakespeare’s works make use of poetic and literary devices that help to reinforce and strengthen the content of the play.
The following are the poetic and literary devices used throughout the play: Imagery - Shakespeare makes use of a lot of imagery in his works. In the play, for instance, the Nurse describes Juliet as a “bright angel,” and Juliet describes Romeo as the “sun,” “star,” and “god.” Personification - Shakespeare uses personification to enhance the content of the play.
For instance, in the play, Romeo claims that love is a “smoke made with the fume of sighs,” and in another instance, Juliet claims that a rose by any other name would “smell as sweet.” Metaphors - Shakespeare employs metaphors to give more weight to the content of the play.
For example, in the play, Romeo uses a metaphor to describe the moon as jealous and sick, saying that the “moon is already sick and pale with grief. ”Symbolism - Shakespeare also employs symbolism to reinforce the content of the play.
know more about literary devices here
https://brainly.com/question/14917014#
#SPJ11
Quinceañera Birthday Bash Preserves Tradition, Marks Passage to Womanhood
(a) What are the two main elements of a typical quinceañera? (b) Analyze What is the importance of each element for the girl and for her parents?
a. The two main elements of a typical quinceañera are the Mass and the fiesta. and b. Analyze Celebration and Adulthood is the importance of each element for the girl and for her parents.
a. Quinceañera Birthday Bash Preserves Tradition, Marks Passage to Womanhood. Widely celebrated among Latinos, the quinceañera marks an important milestone in a girl's life. Part birthday party, part rite of passage, it symbolizes a girl's entrance into womanhood when turning 15, traditionally showcasing her purity and readiness for marriage.
b. The first is a religious ceremony, a special type of mass in which the young woman has her faith reaffirmed and rededicates herself to God. This is seen as the most important part of the quinceanera because naturally God is thought of as being more important than any other aspect of life.
Learn more about Quinceañera Visit: brainly.com/question/6277590
#SPJ4
Helpp please
15
What is the primary goal of all mass media?
A.
to generate profits
B.
to inform the public
C.
to facilitate advertising
D.
to be as accurate as possible
Answer:
Letter B
Explanation:
Compare Zaroff’s and Rainsford’s point of view on the hunt. How does this tension contribute to the moral stakes of the story? Cite evidence from the story in your response.
The tension between Zaroff's and Rainsford's perspectives on hunting contributes to the moral stakes of the story by forcing the reader to confront the ethical implications of hunting for sport.
In Richard Connell's short story "The Most Dangerous Game," General Zaroff and Sanger Rainsford have different perspectives on hunting. Zaroff sees hunting as a form of entertainment and is always looking for a bigger challenge. On the other hand, Rainsford views hunting as a sport and a way to test one's skills, but he is not willing to harm other humans in the process.
This difference in perspective creates tension in the story and contributes to the moral stakes by highlighting the ethical implications of hunting. The story explores the idea that killing for sport, especially human beings, is immoral and unacceptable.
Zaroff justifies his hunting of humans by stating that they are the most challenging game to hunt. He says, "I wanted the ideal animal to hunt, so I said, 'What are the attributes of an ideal quarry? And the answer was, of course, 'It must have courage, cunning, and, above all, it must be able to reason.'"
In contrast, Rainsford is horrified by Zaroff's behavior and sees it as immoral. He says, "But you can't mean--" gasped Rainsford. "My dear fellow," said the general, "have I not told you I always mean what I say about hunting?"
The story challenges the idea that killing for entertainment is acceptable and reinforces the importance of treating all living beings with respect and dignity.
To learn more about Richard Connell's
https://brainly.com/question/21291738
#SPJ4
two reasons why both men and women could become victims of gender based violence
Answer:
•Social norms about the proper roles and responsibilities of men and women.
• These cultural and social norms socialize males to be aggressive, powerful, unemotional, and controlling, and contribute to a social acceptance of men as dominant
In this excerpt Gilgamesh is most characterized as
Gilgamesh is best known for being compassionate and strong because he consistently wins battles.
What is depicted in Gilgamesh's exception?Gilgamesh was paired with a creature that was thought to be powerful, however it is clear from the text that Gilgamesh was able to defeat the monster in combat. This depicts Gilgamesh has been stronger than the monster. Being strong is one of the supernatural traits that epic heroes typically display, and Gilgamesh's tale exemplifies this supernatural trait. The passage highlights Gilgamesh's bravery. It is described by his deed in the text. Because he overcame this monster, Gilgamesh is strong. After considering all of the possibilities, we can conclude that the second response is the right one.
To know more about Gilgamesh visit:
https://brainly.com/question/8120530
#SPJ1
The following questio is incomplete the complete question is a follows:
Read the excerpt from Gilgamesh: A New English Version. Gilgamesh, hearing his beloved friend, came to himself. He yelled, he lifted his massive axe, he swung it, it tore into Humbaba’s neck, the blood shot out, again the axe bit flesh and bone, the monster staggered, his eyes rolled, and at the axe’s third stroke he toppled like a cedar and crashed to the ground. In this excerpt, Gilgamesh is most characterized as compassionate because he listens to his friend. strong because he is triumphant in battle. practical because he does what it takes to survive. confident because he takes unnecessary risks.
A __________ volcano is a volcano with broad, gently sloping sides that usually build up from the floor of the sea.
a.
stratovolcano
c.
shield
b.
cinder cone
d.
all of the above
Answer:
The answer is c. Shield volcanoes
On September 12, 1962, President John F. Kennedy delivered his "We Choose to Go to the Moon" speech to a crowd of thousands at Rice University Stadium in Houston, Texas. The country was unsure about the time and cost of sending a man to the moon, and President Kennedy's speech addressed their uncertainty. Read the excerpts from Kennedy's speech. Then, respond to the prompt that follows.
I am delighted to be here, and I'm particularly delighted to be here on this occasion. We meet at a college noted for knowledge, in a city noted for progress, in a State noted for strength, and we stand in need of all three, for we meet in an hour of change and challenge, in a decade of hope and fear, in an age of both knowledge and ignorance. The greater our knowledge increases, the greater our ignorance unfolds.
Despite the striking fact that most of the scientists that the world has ever known are alive and working today, despite the fact that this Nation's own scientific manpower is doubling every 12 years in a rate of growth more than three times that of our population as a whole, despite that, the vast stretches of the unknown and the unanswered and the unfinished still far outstrip our collective comprehension.
If this capsule history of our progress teaches us anything, it is that man, in his quest for knowledge and progress, is determined and cannot be deterred. The exploration of space will go ahead, whether we join in it or not, and it is one of the great adventures of all time, and no nation which expects to be the leader of other nations can expect to stay behind in the race for space.
Those who came before us made certain that this country rode the first waves of the industrial revolutions, the first waves of modern invention, and the first wave of nuclear power, and this generation does not intend to founder in the backwash of the coming age of space. We mean to be a part of it—we mean to lead it. For the eyes of the world now look into space, to the moon and to the planets beyond, and we have vowed that we shall not see it governed by a hostile flag of conquest, but by a banner of freedom and peace.
We set sail on this new sea because there is new knowledge to be gained, and new rights to be won, and they must be won and used for the progress of all people. For space science, like nuclear science and all technology, has no conscience of its own. Whether it will become a force for good or ill depends on man, and only if the United States occupies a position of pre-eminence can we help decide whether this new ocean will be a sea of peace or a new terrifying theater of war. I do not say that we should or will go unprotected against the hostile misuse of space any more than we go unprotected against the hostile use of land or sea, but I do say that space can be explored and mastered without feeding the fires of war, without repeating the mistakes that man has made in extending his writ around this globe of ours.
Answer:
On September 12, 1962, President John F. Kennedy delivered a speech at Rice University Stadium in Houston, Texas, in which he declared his intention to send a man to the moon. In his speech, Kennedy acknowledged the uncertainty surrounding the time and cost of this endeavor, but insisted that the exploration of space was necessary for progress and leadership in the world. Kennedy emphasized the importance of knowledge, progress, and strength, and noted that despite the vast increase in scientific knowledge and manpower, there were still vast unknowns to explore. He also pointed out that the United States needed to take a leading role in space exploration in order to prevent it from being governed by a hostile flag of conquest, and that it was important to use new knowledge and rights for the progress of all people. Kennedy acknowledged the high cost of the space program, but argued that it was worth the investment for the benefits that would come from exploring space. He famously declared, "We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard." Kennedy's speech is considered a landmark moment in American history, as it set the goal that led to the successful Apollo 11 moon landing in 1969.
Explanation:
BRAINLIEST PLEASE!
Answer:
Explanation:
Based on what you've shared, it seems that the purpose of President Kennedy's speech at Rice University in 1962 was to build public support for his proposal to land a man on the Moon before the end of the decade. By speaking at a university known for its expertise in science and technology, Kennedy likely aimed to inspire and rally the academic and scientific community behind his vision for space exploration, while also appealing to the broader public's sense of national pride and curiosity about the unknown. The speech also aimed to reassure Americans that their government was committed to advancing the country's scientific and technological capabilities, especially in the midst of the Cold War.
true or false: unless we can verify a sentence by the methods of science we cannot confidently and rationally judge the statement to be true.
True. We can only confidently and rationally judge a statement to be true if we can verify it through the methods of science.
To verify a sentence, we must use the scientific method to conduct experiments and observations, analyze the data, and reach a conclusion. Not all statements can be verified by the methods of science, and there are other ways to judge the truth or falsity of a statement, such as through logical analysis, empirical observation, or expert testimony.While the scientific method is a reliable way to verify empirical claims, there are other rational methods of evaluating truth claims, such as deductive reasoning and logical argumentation. While scientific methods are important for verifying certain types of statements, there are many other valid methods of verification and evaluation, such as logical reasoning, empirical observation, and historical analysis. Additionally, some statements may not be verifiable by any method and may be matters of belief or opinion rather than objective fact.
Learn more about philosophy or epistemology here:https://brainly.ph/question/19725437
#SPJ11
When J.D. and Usha get married,
they both change their last name
to Vance. Why is the change
significant for both of them?
Changing their last name to Vance represents a new beginning and the merging of identities for J.D. Vance and his wife Usha.
What does culture mean?
Culture refers to the shared beliefs, values, customs, behaviors, and artifacts that characterize a group or society. It encompasses a wide range of elements, including language, religion, art, music, food, and social norms, and shapes the way people interact with one another and the world around them. Culture is an important aspect of human life, providing individuals with a sense of identity and belonging, and influencing their attitudes and behaviors.
J.D. Vance and Usha, his wife, changing their last name to Vance after their marriage is significant for both of them for several reasons. Firstly, it represents a new beginning for both of them as they start their life together as a married couple. Secondly, it symbolizes the merging of their identities and the creation of a new family unit. Thirdly, for J.D., the name Vance has historical significance as it is his family name and connects him to his Appalachian roots. For Usha, who is originally from India, taking on the Vance name represents a choice to embrace J.D.'s culture and family heritage. Overall, changing their last name to Vance signifies the coming together of two individuals from different backgrounds and the creation of a new family identity that is meaningful to both of them.
To know more about Appalachian visit:
https://brainly.com/question/26761785
#SPJ1
how does replacing the phrase quickly with the word hastily affect your understanding of jessica and her actions? jessica quickly typed up the final draft of her term paper.
Replacing the phrase "quickly" with the word "hastily" would imply that Jessica was in a hurry while typing up the final draft of her term paper.
The use of the word "hastily" can be considered as negative as it implies that Jessica did not put in the required effort while typing her final draft. So, this change in phrase can change one's understanding of Jessica and her actions.What is a phrase?A phrase is a group of two or more words that forms a grammatical unit without a subject and a predicate. It is a group of words that express a single idea but does not form a complete sentence. It can function as a noun, verb, adverb, or adjective in a sentence. A phrase can also be used in different grammatical roles to convey different meanings. In a sentence, a phrase usually modifies the main clause by adding more information to the subject.
Learn more about phrase here:https://brainly.com/question/7744384
#SPJ11
How does coach phillips respond to the opposing claim that a naturally gifted runner doesn’t need to practice
Answer:
each runner run's 2/5 of a mile, So 5 people would be needed to run two miles.therefore he'd need Ten runner
3. How does the way Prometheus describes Jupiter differ from the way the narrator describes Jupiter
(PROMETHEUS AND PANDORAS BOX)
answers:
a: Prometheus thinks Jupiter is disloyal while the narrator sees him as just
b: prometheus does not understand Jupiter while the narrator knows he is evil
c: prometheus reveres the king of the gods while the narrator treats Jupiter like any other character
d: prometheus sees Jupiter as unjust tyrant while the narrator calls him a "Mighty One" without judgement
The option that tells the way Prometheus describes Jupiter differ from the way the narrator describes Jupiter is d: Prometheus sees Jupiter as an unjust tyrant while the narrator calls him a "Mighty One" without judgment.
What is the issue with Prometheus view?In the story "Prometheus and Pandora's Box," Prometheus describes Jupiter (also known as Zeus) as an unjust tyrant. He accuses Jupiter of withholding fire from humanity, even though it is a necessary tool for survival. Prometheus sees Jupiter's actions as cruel and unfair.
On the other hand, the narrator of the story doesn't make any judgments about Jupiter's character. The narrator simply describes him as a powerful god, referring to him as "Mighty One." The narrator doesn't express an opinion about Jupiter's actions or motives.
Therefore, the way Prometheus describes Jupiter differs from the way the narrator describes him.
Learn more about Prometheus from
https://brainly.com/question/29422178
#SPJ1
I would like to see the film (. ) You were talking about
For the above statement the answer may be That. I would like to see the film that you were taking about.
What is That ?
The term "that" is frequently used in English and has a wide range of usages.
'That' and 'those' are typically used with the preposition 'there' to imply that the object (or objects) is not close to the.
Now in the above statement I would like to see the film that you were talking about -
Here that is connecting two different statements and bringing a meaning for it.
That as a Relative Pronoun:
You can join two clauses together with "that" by using it as a relative pronoun.2.We can also use who or which in the place of that.
To know more about relative pronoun visit:
https://brainly.com/question/814678
#SPJ1
mistakes or verbal stumbles during a speech:group of answer choicesare the most memorable part of the speechpletely distract the audience from the main message.distract the audience from receiving the message.do not undermine the entire speech.expose the speaker as ignorant or unprepared.
No, mistakes or verbal stumbles during a speech do not undermine the entire speech and do not necessarily expose the speaker as ignorant or unprepared.
When your audience doesn't comprehend what you're talking about, it can be one of the biggest distractions during a speech. Writing and organizing your presentation with your audience in mind will make it simpler for them to understand. Additionally, when a speaker tries to convey too much information, listening becomes challenging. Effective speakers can help overcome the frequent barrier of information overload by including repetition in their presentations and giving specific instances of new knowledge to aid audience members in interpreting and comprehending the main points. For two key reasons, it's crucial to think about our voice when speaking.
To know more about speaker refer :
brainly.com/question/23362729
#SPJ4